10th Circuit Corner Crossing Ruling: What does this mean for MT?

Saw some giants up on that flat from the opposing mountain range over the years.



I’m not sure if I’m more excited about trying to access the ones I’ve always wanted but never had the balls to, or more disappointed all the ones I’ve already accessed and saw minimal people and nobody seemed to give AF about that everyone else will now.
Look forward to the story. mtmuley
 
Nice work folks.

Just as an aside, Chief Justice Swanson represented Citizens for Balanced Use at the legislature, not UPOM.

He did represent CBU, UPOM & a few legislators on a bison lawsuit.
CBU.UPOM. SFW. Some other orgs.

Really all the same interests - behind them.
 
So would it be best to cross from federal to federal? Keep the state land out of it? Or rather, find someone blocking access at the corner of federal to federal? Man if I wasn’t moving out of state and knew I had the manpower of HT and its proponents behind me I’d be so down…

Hey, that brings up another good question; do you think it played any role that these dudes were outta-staters? Would it be better if I did this as a 10th circuit resident? Because I will be…

isnt this textbook definition of conspiracy?

Would it ACTUALLY be conspiracy to commit any crimes? Or is this ultimately unbinding us from the crimes?

“Conspiracy to commit criminal trespass” by crossing one piece of public land to another… 🤔 @Elky Welky
 
I don’t think ol Ted would be too thrilled about corner crossing on federal land… just need to see if there’s anything posted that you cannot cross right? That would imply an enclosure?
 
Leupold Banner

Forum statistics

Threads
115,064
Messages
2,082,333
Members
36,914
Latest member
alexv123
Back
Top