Against all odds, your business tax advice somehow makes more sense than your take on this issue😜
I think it’s pretty clear that we are quite a ways apart on this one, all good.
So you basically want nonresidents to essentially pay for hunting leases for locals only?
Holy smokes dude, the welfare entitlement of your post is unreal. Is that a normal sentiment where you live?!
I am surprised to see you even put that post out there.
You are free to live wherever you want, my man.
I am not trying to be critical- you are asking the right question in my opinion. My point is that there is a way to achieve exactly what you are proposing- how can landowners receive money, yet still retain control of who is hunting their land...
How are BMA payments funded?
But I think you are actually onto the end goal, you just got off the bus one stop too soon.
National>state>local>… individual.
I’m sorry for the part I played in derailing. I think the “What makes this a worthwhile Business entertainment expense?” part threw a few of us off of your trail.
The one point about letting the clients shoot first, especially if you’re with guys who don’t hunt much, is a great point. I’ve...
This is my understanding as well.
I know @Big Fin has commented on this before. Not to solicit free advice, but any clarification would be most appreciated by the peanut gallery!
I don’t think that’s exactly how it works… sure wish it did though.
*I would love to be wrong on this, but I know it is not the case in my line of work.
There are a ton of valid points to make on both sides of this one.
Objectively (removing the raw emotional opposition), I think we can all agree here that practically, Colorado has done a better job with this issue than WY/MT.