I hear ya. I'm on a likely-futile march to the promised land of Region H, though there's a decent chance I end up in the same no man's land you're referring to.
The tables with the numbers are by herd units and not hunt areas, would that be the reason the numbers may not jive?Some weird math in those tables. My unit is up 3,000 in population, so they are adding 100 additional estimated harvest. What’s weird is they are estimating 400 additional hunters, and it’s a unit with historically 90+% success rate. Not sure how if you add 400 hunters to unit with 90% success you only expect 100 additional harvest.
Edit: Is that called “Montana math”?
Looks like they increased the quota for some of the type 6 tags that are good on or near irrigated land.
They held Public meetings in February regarding herd health. They asked for attendees to fill out surveys on how they would like to see deer management to proceed with regards to CWD. Basically they asked if the public wanted to prioritize older age class bucks vs allowing more take of younger bucks with the idea of trying to curb the spread of the disease. I'm not sure on the results of the survey or if it's been published anywhere yet.
I am not familiar with Wyoming F&G management
Spot on, iirc they used to remove it entirely some years in region w.
Yes. They have to be signed by the Commissioner and the Governor yet. But they posted online under the season dates for each species. I have not seen the Governor overrule the commission since I became a resident of Wyoming, so what is published is pretty much final. Just a formality to get the signatures at this point.
where is “here” ?
