Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I purchased some demo b2's and compared them to some vortex razor hd 10x42's, and some swarovski el 10x42's and some maven b.1 10x42. Optically they were really really good..... but they are GIANT! If size and weight isn't a concern, i would highly recommend them, but try to handle a pair first if you can.
Considering the b1 and b2 have a completely different prism system there should have been a slight difference at dawn/dusk. That prism system is what makes them brighter but slight larger, mine fit great in my medium marsupial harness, just like my 10x50 bx-3 leupolds did. Abbe Koenig is larger and heavier versus Schmidt Pechan. You see these as BX-5 Leupolds, Zig Sauer Zulu 9, some Zeiss models, and the Maven B2 and I believe the B4.
I was used to handling 10x50's which were nearly identical to the 9x45 b2's but if you are used to 8x42's I can see why they would seem large.
It's hard to find many b1 vs b2 comparisons but I know at least one individual on this forum found the b2 better. In fact I've read a post on another forum where a gentleman claims the b1 is inferior to even other bino in the same price range. That seems to go against the idea that any Maven is as good as a much more expensive bino due to retail.
My new personal plan is to demo both b1 and b2 this winter to see which if either is worth the cash compared to my current binos. But I'm always interested to hear others' take on the two.
I read that vortex and maven both get there glass from zen ray. Why not just buy vortex? Since their warranty is so great.