Probably not, as most convicts would file off any kind of identifiable information from their weapon of choice.I just wonder if the lettering on his non-firearm is crisp.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably not, as most convicts would file off any kind of identifiable information from their weapon of choice.I just wonder if the lettering on his non-firearm is crisp.
The only question I ask is if I still want to hunt near this other hunter which I ask regardless of weapon type.Don't you ever ask yourself, "Is that guy a convict or what!" whenever you see a non-gun in the deer woods during a gun season? There might be other reasons for non-guns during gun seasons, but one possibility is that the hunter might be banned from getting a gun.
Well, maybe I'm a bit a paranoid. Even if a convict were to be in the field with a bow, air gun or muzzle-loader during gun seasons, I should feel relatively safe because I would be only carrying a superior weapon during gun seasons, a GUN. Of course, being that I'm in Oklahoma, I'm also allowed to carry a pistol in the field for self-defense during archery seasons as well as gun seasons.The only question I ask is if I still want to hunt near this other hunter which I ask regardless of weapon type.
I...what....no...just no...Is seeing a non-firearm during gun seasons a cause for alarm? The man seen with a bow during gun season might be a registered sex offender.
Well, maybe I'm a bit a paranoid. Even if a convict were to be in the field with a bow, air gun or muzzle-loader during gun seasons, I should feel relatively safe because I would be only carrying a superior weapon during gun seasons, a GUN. Of course, being that I'm in Oklahoma, I'm also allowed to carry a pistol in the field for self-defense during archery seasons as well as gun seasons.
I was on jury duty once. A man was on trial for DUI. The man, defendant, was stopped at 2 in the morning for driving on the wrong side of the street. He was cited for that and a DUI as well. During the trial, the defendant testified on the witness stand, that he had to be to a job interview at 7:30 that same morning the officer had stopped his car. A fellow juror in deliberation, a skeptical old man, asked out loud as to why the man would be out driving his car late at night with a job interview coming so soon that same morning. The man had stated he was going home from his brother's house and also admitted that he had two beers while at his brother's. Still, the prosecution had to prove that he was actually driving under the influence. I ask myself today, "Why would a sober person be driving on the wrong side of the street?" If there are potholes or a stalled vehicle, I can see steering around them on the left but no legitimate reason for driving on the wrong side of the street was ever addressed at the trial back in the summer of 1985.
A skeptical person likewise might wonder what somebody is doing hunting with a bow, muzzle-loader or air gun during a gun season. I might be interviewing a candidate for a job hire. A very sensitive job like armored car driver that requires a very squeaky-clean record. I might have taxidermy mounts in my office. The job interviewee, seeing I'm the outdoorsy type, might mention that he killed a buck last week with his recurve bow. Last week might be late November, the heart of gun deer season. I'm thinking to myself, "Hmmmm, a bow during gun seasons? How odd." Can't he even get a gun? I think I'd better look at his criminal background check again closely. He is required to armed for this job position.
But I digress.
We convicted the man for driving on the wrong side of the street but acquitted him on the DUI count in spite of the old man's skepticism. He past the alphabet writing test with flying colors. The man at the trial had actually admitted driving on the wrong side of the street. The policeman on the traffic stop had him write the ABC's on a sheet of paper as a field sobriety test. The man had in fact refused a blood alcohol test. His lawyer argued he was afraid of needles.
I just assume pretty much every other person on the road is an a-hole, just because they're in a car. They're probably drunk or high too, what possible other reason could they have for being on the road at the same time as me? They should go straight to jail. I hope I get jury duty some day, you're all going to end up in the clink if I have any say in it, along with the sex offenders and other felonious non-firearm hunters...
Maybe they carry a bow late November in the deer woods coz they are just gun shy. Ears sensitive to gunfire. Maybe shoulder is recoil sensitive. Not necessarily coz the NICS check came back denied for that expensive, unreliable and inaccurate new-fangled Japan-made Browning BAR they were about to buy otherwise.I...what....no...just no...
Problem solving...just don't turn your back to him or her...just in case
I do it when I'm hunting people, nice and quiet.Maybe they carry a bow late November in the deer woods coz they are just gun shy. Ears sensitive to gunfire. Maybe shoulder is recoil sensitive. Not necessarily coz the NICS check came back denied for that expensive, unreliable and inaccurate new-fangled Japan-made Browning BAR they were about to buy otherwise.
The man, defendant, was stopped at 2 in the morning for driving on the wrong side of the street.
Thanks for adding fuel to my 2am thoughts.Serious question; is a hotdog a sandwich?
Yes/No?
This makes my head hurt. If I was only given this to judge by I would say yes you are in fact paranoid.Well, maybe I'm a bit a paranoid.
A piece of meat, inside bread, covered with pucky (unless you're like Big Fin) That's a sandwich. I use the term "meat" loosely.And more importantly- no a hotdog is not a sandwich.