California court rules a bumblebee is a fish under environmental law
The California State Appellate Court of the Third District has ruled a bumblebee can be classified as a fish, overturning a previous decision.
Who comes up with this stuff?
- Thread starter Dave N
- Start date
Derek44
Well-known member
Hey if school kids can be cats…..California court rules a bumblebee is a fish under environmental law
The California State Appellate Court of the Third District has ruled a bumblebee can be classified as a fish, overturning a previous decision.www.foxnews.com
In all seriousness though, I’ll have to look again but I didn’t see any where that stated what the actual context of the hearing was even for? Noticed it was the almond alliance vs. wildlife dept. over endangered species but I’m genuinely curious.
drexal
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 4, 2021
- Messages
- 239
Well, it's California so...
But basically, lawyers found flaws in the wording, so they said, "hey, if an "octopus" is a "fish", why not "bumblebees"? And the courts not only entertained it, but they also concurred. So, bees are fish... at least in California!
But basically, lawyers found flaws in the wording, so they said, "hey, if an "octopus" is a "fish", why not "bumblebees"? And the courts not only entertained it, but they also concurred. So, bees are fish... at least in California!
kwyeewyk
Well-known member
How about instead of reclassifying bees as fish just clarify that the original intent was to include invertebrates as well?
L
longbow51
Guest
But what if the bees identify as beavers? or eagles?
