2ski
Well-known member
The thread he's talking about was a show your elk thread. It's a short synopsis and we don't have all the info. The guy just says he missed 9 shots at abull with a rifle he hadn't sighted in. That was a bit he left out.Is the situation in the thread by @Mtnhunter1, what you are talking about?
https://www.hunttalk.com/threads/stolen-opportunities-a-very-sad-elk-tale-we-must-do-better.316516/
I think shooting at multiple animals/not checking for hits should be citation worthy (even if you think you missed).
I made a longer shot on a whitetail doe last year. I had a rangefinder and I was confident in my ability to make the shot. Since it was antlerless season, I also set up my spotting scope and made sure, at 40X, that it wasn’t a spike or other small rack buck. Much to my surprise, she didn’t drop in her tracks. Instead, she ran off at the shot and disappeared into the woods after about 25 yards. I am guessing there are people who would have not checked for evidence of a hit and just assumed that a 230 gr bullet from a 30 Nosler would have dropped her before she made the woods had it been a fatal shot. I am not one of them. Due to the topography, I had to pack up my gear, hike back to drive about two miles and then hike about two miles to get to where she had been. She was laying about 35 yards beyond where I had last seen her.
For those who assume they missed, but don’t check to confirm, the words of Ron White come to mind — “You can’t fix stupid.”
I guess i have issue with this thread. I'm going to assume the guy knew he had 9nreal misses. And no game warden is going to site a guy for missing 9 times. That's just silly.