scubohuntr
Active member
In most states, if you leave a treestand on public land someone else is free to use it, but not to take it. I don't use either treestands or trail cameras because of the theft problem.
One of the most basic tenets of law in this country is the concept of innocent until proven guilty. Although poaching is probably the most likely explanation, it's not the only one. Could be research, or just someone trying to get pictures in the off season and thinking it's okay because they are not hunting. Taking someone's property without consent or due process of law is theft, no two ways about it. A sworn law enforcement officer can confiscate property as evidence in an investigation, but the property must be returned at the conclusion of the investigation unless it is ordered forfeited by a court. The process is subject to stringent chain of custody rules, in order to prove that all is done within the law. By removing the camera from the site outside of any chain of custody, you have made it impossible for the authorities to prosecute the case, even if they have the time and resources to do so.
One of the most basic tenets of law in this country is the concept of innocent until proven guilty. Although poaching is probably the most likely explanation, it's not the only one. Could be research, or just someone trying to get pictures in the off season and thinking it's okay because they are not hunting. Taking someone's property without consent or due process of law is theft, no two ways about it. A sworn law enforcement officer can confiscate property as evidence in an investigation, but the property must be returned at the conclusion of the investigation unless it is ordered forfeited by a court. The process is subject to stringent chain of custody rules, in order to prove that all is done within the law. By removing the camera from the site outside of any chain of custody, you have made it impossible for the authorities to prosecute the case, even if they have the time and resources to do so.