BrentD
Well-known member
This is an interesting question and one that I have pondered a lot today when I should have been doing other things.
Sure certain, a number of ungulate species are doing a whole bunch better than they were 80 yrs ago. None more spectacularly so than Whitetails, but I think Elk, bison, and maybe antelope could be included.
Add turkeys and alligators, maybe black bears in many areas (esp. the East), and I just accidentally typed and erased beers before realizing that they have definitely changed for the better too.
I think technology has changed dramatically, and for the worse, almost without exception. I know I'm going to be in the minority on that opinion, but I fear for hunting because of the technology. Better boots, tents and jackets are one thing but cartridges, bullets, rifles, range finders, ballistics software, and glassware are another and I do not share the popular opinion that they are for the better if one looks at the biggest picture of hunting. There are, however, lots of advances in fireproof suits, so I will be putting mine on right now.
While hunting populations may be better in many areas for many species, there might also be far fewer populations due to habitat loss. That would make for an interesting analysis.
One thing that as definitely changed is the number of people hunting and with more time and money and capability to be successful in hunting. When I look at the threads on what tags and points people apply for, I am stunned. That certainly was not common 80 yrs ago.
Sure certain, a number of ungulate species are doing a whole bunch better than they were 80 yrs ago. None more spectacularly so than Whitetails, but I think Elk, bison, and maybe antelope could be included.
Add turkeys and alligators, maybe black bears in many areas (esp. the East), and I just accidentally typed and erased beers before realizing that they have definitely changed for the better too.
I think technology has changed dramatically, and for the worse, almost without exception. I know I'm going to be in the minority on that opinion, but I fear for hunting because of the technology. Better boots, tents and jackets are one thing but cartridges, bullets, rifles, range finders, ballistics software, and glassware are another and I do not share the popular opinion that they are for the better if one looks at the biggest picture of hunting. There are, however, lots of advances in fireproof suits, so I will be putting mine on right now.
While hunting populations may be better in many areas for many species, there might also be far fewer populations due to habitat loss. That would make for an interesting analysis.
One thing that as definitely changed is the number of people hunting and with more time and money and capability to be successful in hunting. When I look at the threads on what tags and points people apply for, I am stunned. That certainly was not common 80 yrs ago.