D
I definitely wouldn't say it's hunters specifically, just a societal problem at large I try to keep as much space from when possible. The whole "20 year olds with lower test levels than 50 year olds two generations ago" pretty sketch IMO
I get the logic here but are there population scale makers of actual toxicity? It's one thing to say something is toxic based on lab data on an individual or finer scale, but surely we have been using plastic wrap for a generation, I have yet to see where hunters are at a higher risk due to those endocrine disrupters.
I definitely wouldn't say it's hunters specifically, just a societal problem at large I try to keep as much space from when possible. The whole "20 year olds with lower test levels than 50 year olds two generations ago" pretty sketch IMO