Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are outstanding smiths across the country, I would recommend finding one within driving distance so you can sit down with them to come up with what will best suit you.
Is the .270 a shooter? Maybe just better glass on it. You won’t be able to tell the difference in the field between the .270 and a 6.5.
Anyways....decided that will go with something factory made and ready and since my hunt is end of October and I have no time to mess around with starting a custom build and get it delivered within time. From the ones that could be relatively had sooner, I have the below options:
- Proof Research Elevation (their cheapest model) comes in at ~ $3000
- Christensen Arms Traverse ~ $2300 (but hearing some QC issues out of it in one off cases)
- Or Buy a Tikka T3x Camo in 6.5 CM and invest the remaining amount in a Swarovski scope.
So you are planning on upgrading your Tikka T3x in .270 with a Tikka T3x Camo in 6.5 CM? Is it the Camo or the 6.5 CM that is the upgrade?
Wait....
Which do you want?
A hunting rifle, or a precision target rifle?
The 2 are very different firearms.
With an October hunt, I’d go with that .270 for this year and make plans for the new rifle after your fall hunting is over. You don’t need the stress of setting up a new rifle right before a hunt.
Been thinking of that exactly. To get one of the proof research barrelled ones. They seem to have a good reputation in the precision shooting community.If history is a teacher, thin barrels as used for hunting, do not make for good extended shooting sessions.
Been there, done that!
You want light weight & extended shooting sessions, get a Proof Research carbon wrapped barrel.
Otherwise extended shooting sessions are best served by a heavy barrel.
One that you wouldn't want to hump far from the truck.
I have hunted with several Tikka's for many years (.270 is my go to). Then I got a Christensen Ridgeline as a gift from my dad. the CA is a great gun, but I still prefer my tikka over it. To me, the tikka is a hunting rifle, and the CA is a range gun. The tolerances on the CA are so tight and "sharp edged" it makes me very nervous in the field. A little dirt and my frear is the gun will jam on me, it is also not as smooth to cycle. I also much prefer the short bolt throw of the tikka over the CA. I hunted one trip last year with the CA, and that will likely be my last time. I get peoples obsession with accuracy, but I think there is certainly a sacrifice that is made when it comes to "hunting reliability".
As mentioned if you want to upgrade, I would customize the Tikka to get exactly what you want and save money. I can tell you, my CA will be in my gun safe this fall and the tikka over my shoulder.
Before you get rid of the 270 you have I'd get the limbsaver pad for $30 and try it out. I know you had another thread talking about recoil but you'll be amazed how much more enjoyable that rifle will be and in my opinion the ammo will be a lot more economical than a 6.5 unless you reload. That Tikka is an amazing gun and I just dont see you gaining much by going with the 6.5 over the 270 but ultimately thats your personal choice.
If i has a $2300 budget I’d be building a rifle. Then I could get exactly what I wanted