Dancerpro
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2021
- Messages
- 92
I have been watching hunting shows and where trail cameras are mentioned, theft follows. I have noticed that those that have the discussion of camera placement, those who place them high have better success with getting more natural photos of their target species. I believe this is due to them being higher with a wider field of view. My question is, if you place a trail camera in a lower place on the tree and camouflage it and then 1 or 2 up higher camouflaged as well, would you be more successful with the target species and have more success in trapping thieves?
I know trail cameras are expensive and are used broadly as an eye on a promising LOOKING area, but I also know thieves are a smaller percentage of any group and, for me, that is why catching and prosecuting thieves is important.
What am I looking for when setting out trail cameras? I understand that trail intersections are important, just as food, water and bedding are. But what makes 1 place any better than another?
I know this post wanders a bit, but the subjects work together, 1 in finding rich hunting areas and 2 keeping your property safe.
I know trail cameras are expensive and are used broadly as an eye on a promising LOOKING area, but I also know thieves are a smaller percentage of any group and, for me, that is why catching and prosecuting thieves is important.
What am I looking for when setting out trail cameras? I understand that trail intersections are important, just as food, water and bedding are. But what makes 1 place any better than another?
I know this post wanders a bit, but the subjects work together, 1 in finding rich hunting areas and 2 keeping your property safe.