BigHornyRam
New member
Right Elky,
National defense and police/prison security are a must and the cost to provide them should be divided equally among the population. The only question would be how strong of protection we need.
So if the total cost is represented by X annually, and Y is the number of people in the country, then X/Y would be each persons annual share of National Security. This is how it would work in a society where there were no subsidies. Not how it is today, "let's make the rich guy pay for everything".
Works for me.
Paul
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 05-06-2003 06:52: Message edited by: Paul C ]</font>
National defense and police/prison security are a must and the cost to provide them should be divided equally among the population. The only question would be how strong of protection we need.
So if the total cost is represented by X annually, and Y is the number of people in the country, then X/Y would be each persons annual share of National Security. This is how it would work in a society where there were no subsidies. Not how it is today, "let's make the rich guy pay for everything".
Works for me.
Paul
<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ 05-06-2003 06:52: Message edited by: Paul C ]</font>