COVID vaccine doubter Alex Berenson sues Biden over Twitter ban
Berenson was banned from Twitter in August 2021 after he claimed the COVID-19 vaccine did not halt transmission of the virus.
nypost.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This thread should have a disclaimer: if after four hours…consult the forum moderator.*New Thread Title
Medicating the Funyun
COVID vaccine doubter Alex Berenson sues Biden over Twitter ban
Berenson was banned from Twitter in August 2021 after he claimed the COVID-19 vaccine did not halt transmission of the virus.nypost.com
That word is a low tech Godwin...Some pretty retarded people on here. You've been exploited.
“Differently Abled”, I believe it is now.Some pretty retarded people on here. You've been exploited.
99 more & he's close...I'll bet your man isn't laughing. Who'd a thought a multibillionaire could not come up with a half billion, if they needed to.
He needs your help, so stop posting and start donating. This is time sensitive.
Berenson was censored on twitter for saying the Covid 19 vaccination did not stop transmission of the virus. That is easily looked up, I’m sure a quick google search will pull it up.
Big Fin will probably ban you when he sees this.This thread should have a disclaimer: if after four hours…consult the forum moderator.
I'm sure he has contemplated it already.Big Fin will probably ban you when he sees this.
Are you implying twitter wasn't an advocate of left of center narrative and conversely a suppressor of opposing narrative...without assigning homework?I'm not aware of Twitter specifically saying, "These are the tweets we are banning you for posting."
I'm sure one could find lots of factual stuff that Berenson said, and lots of incorrect things that are still incorrect. I'm not inclined to participate in the logical fallacy that because he made one tweet that was factual all of his were, or vice versa. I'm sure he was prolific and I'm sure we could cherry pick examples until the cows come home. Hence my question for specifics.
His case settlement had nothing to do with the veracity or lack thereof of his posts but on the way twitter communicated and administered their policies.
I'm stating what happened in that specific matter, and saying that as far as the content of the tweets; I didn't read them, I haven't seen a summary of the objectionable ones and therefore can't engage on the topic.Are you implying twitter wasn't an advocate of left of center narrative and conversely a suppressor of opposing narrative...without assigning homework?
Are you implying twitter wasn't an advocate of left of center narrative and conversely a suppressor of opposing narrative...without assigning homework?
No more than than new handle of the former Montanan now living in Michigan.Is that a racist comment? I'm kidding, I'm kidding.
In Idaho it is in person at the County Courthouse. Except when the Legislature forgets to authorize a Primary.Ours is in person at a polling location.
Twitter as an extension of the DNC would've been sufficient....and that is what I posited.Isn't it pretty irrelevant, even if true? Twitter is the final arbiter of what they allow on their platform. They are not the government. Just as on this board, we are not without restriction to what we post. We have no legal recourse if we are silenced.
Any cooperation between Twitter and and a governmental agency, is at the end of the day, a voluntary action by Twitter. A person could argue the GOP and Fox news have enjoyed a similar relationship for many years. Twitter and Fox for that matter have the final say of what is censored and what isn't.
Trump did not like Twitter and created an alternative platform to maintain the ability to get his voice heard. It is one of the few things I'll give him a tip of the hat for doing. You can bet that they censor what stays up on their platform.