The End of Environmental Regulations/Chevron

[Benfromalbuquerque]

Nobody’s favorite congresswoman spoke today at a hearing. It went over like a lead balloon in a Superfund field.

Lauren Boebert is laughed at on the House floor as she’s fact-checked by EPA head

The head of EPA expressed concerns about the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling limiting federal agencies’ authority

www.yahoo.com

 

[Sytes]

The people supplied to our two party system that trench R & D voters place into office is disgusting YET the Registered R&Ds keep eating the slop served.

You get the representation you vote into office. At some point you might want to think about what your party serves you.
If it was a restaurant, you sure as chit wouldn't go back! Then again, maybe the "sure as chit" has really become a standard flavor of choice.

Question your Republican and Democrat leadership. Their restaurants SUCK!

What a good chit she made herself to be. Yet, entrenched Rs will slurp her up as Fighting against the crappy EPA agency! Rah, Rah!
Reminds me of some toons here who follow loudmouth grade school bullies and cheer on their chump.

 

[Nameless Range]

Please elaborate…

Will this affect 2001 Roadless rule and similar?

The bikes in wilderness folks seem to think it will help their cause:

 

[TOGIE]

The bikes in wilderness folks seem to think it will help their cause:

View attachment 336333

they're forgetting about the other obstacle where i hide behind trees along the trail with a baseball bat.

 

[rogerthat]

they're forgetting about the other obstacle where i hide behind trees along the trail with a baseball bat.

But these guys ride sustainably…nothing to worry about

 

[elkduds]

they're forgetting about the other obstacle where i hide behind trees along the trail with a baseball bat.

Carrying a bike several miles out of a wilderness area won't be as much fun as riding it in was.

 

[SAJ-99]

The bikes in wilderness folks seem to think it will help their cause:

View attachment 336333

There is so much wrong in that post it is hard to pick just one thing. However, I would say that their admission of "subject to regulation" is going to be the sticking point. Not much ambiguity in that.

 

[44hunter45]

The bikes in wilderness folks seem to think it will help their cause:

View attachment 336333

Apparently a lot of Constitutional lawyers ride mountain bikes. An awful lot of gratuitous assertion in that.