Addicting
Well-known member
Has anyone actually communicated with the county commissioners to see why they don’t support it? Maybe there is a compromise verses a lynching that can be done.
I tend to support not in perpetuity. Doing it for the next 20, 50, or 99 years is still a win that won’t infringe on future property owners rights. Why does a property owner 647 years from now, in a completely different landscape, have to deal with the perpetual decision made today?
I’m sure there is a win here for Conservation if folks are willing to discuss it.
I tend to support not in perpetuity. Doing it for the next 20, 50, or 99 years is still a win that won’t infringe on future property owners rights. Why does a property owner 647 years from now, in a completely different landscape, have to deal with the perpetual decision made today?
I’m sure there is a win here for Conservation if folks are willing to discuss it.