I've stipulated that both here in post #111 above (but where it won't have an effect on CPW unless they are lurking on HT) and in direct communications to the commission (where it may have similar non-effect, but at least has been seen by people who could do something).
I think it's an excellent way to start to address crowding (real or perceived), resource management (allows better data-driven decision making and if coupled with other changes like harvest reporting methods, improves quality of said data also), and potentially (though doubtful) point creep, but still allows a lot of flexibility for hunters.
There are 'tentacles' to that approach that would need a lot of framework re-design, but it doesn't seem on the surface that there are huge hurdles outside of 'but we've always done it this way'
