Hilljackoutlaw
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
- Messages
- 6,948
You politic guys are f u c k i n g lunatics!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did he kill only trophies to feed these people in need?So.... My late Uncle would likely be called a serial poacher today. He's deceased now so you can't kill him.
The family didn't approve of the activity (and I was limited to the amount of time I could spend with him), but he was wild since he was young. All the best family stories all were about him. Once in a while, the family would lose track of where he was. They would send me over to the police department and county jail to look for him (he was a regular and would occupy the same cell). Back then the judge would be more sympathetic and would only give him a few days here or there. Sometimes he was just trying to get away from his wife and other times he actually got caught doing something he shouldn't have.
Believe it or not he had a pretty amiable relationship with the game wardens. They would meet up for coffee about once a month and talk about wildlife. For those of you who remember it seemed to me to be something like this
View attachment 363342
He didn't necessary see himself as a poacher though. In his mind, he was a market hunter (did this for a living), who would kill wild game, fish, crab, trap ect and sell it to regular customers who were often disadvantaged. He thought that he was providing a service to those who couldn't do it themselves at a reasonable price and was living his American dream.
He felt that the government's involvement in wild game procurement and season restrictions was more of a big government intrusion harking back to European models when the the wild game only went to the rich. The hunting licence was extortion of the everyday man, to keep them out of the woods and in the grocery stores.
He did have a hunting and commercial fishing license in the end. He did often struggle with seasons and game laws.
Many may find this offensive, but the one thing that was definitely evident to me as a young boy, was that he absolutely loved wild things and wild places. His enthusiasm for hunting and fishing was absolutely infectious.
He respected a good trophy like any hunter would. He would show it off (if it were legal), any good rack or a big fish or even a giant crab or oyster. He would brag about a haul when it was abundant but he did not seem to discriminate. Deer were deer to him, if a doe were available then he killed the doe. He was literally just happy to be outdoors hunting and fishing.Did he kill only trophies to feed these people in need?
Answer the question specific to this thread and the article.Perhaps Buzz, you should stay in your own lane and go count some trees or whatever you do. Maybe go do some more big game scouting on the government dime in your Joe Fed truck. I have spent days and weeks living with felony serial poachers in UC situations. But I am certain you know way more than I do about their mind- set.
I wouldn't think that their behavior would change on just removing privileges. If the poachers feel justified by feeding their families or because that's what their families have always done; I think that they would continue to do it regardless of the law. They may also feel more embodend because they think that they are sticking it to the man. They will get agreement from folks on that and think that they are justified.Answer the question specific to this thread and the article.
How did loss of hunting privileges change the behavior of this guy?
I would argue it didn't, not even one bit.
Maybe his third life suspension will change his behavior this time.
I wouldn't think that their behavior would change on just removing privileges...... I think that the inconvenience of being locked up for a long period of time would change that behavior and would perhaps send a message to the whole family(s) that think the same.
Exactly why loss of hunting privileges doesn't mean a
Exactly how many felonies did this jag-off rack up. I take it he was banned from owning firearms because of the felony charges. He could of, and should of been put away for a long long time. If the DA and the Judge did their jobs.This guy needs jail time to keep him out of the woods. The bans are useless and fine most likely won't be paid back.