Salmon fishing halted on the Columbia River

AZ402

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Messages
4,406
Location
Cottonwood,Arizona
PORTLAND, Ore. - An agency that regulates the West Coast's biggest river has halted sport and commercial fishing for three kinds of fish after scientists became alarmed about a mysterious collapse in the population of salmon.






The Columbia River Compact voted Tuesday to shut down sport fishing for salmon, steelhead trout and shad to avoid losing too many salmon that are preparing to spawn. Officials also suspended commercial fishing on selective stocks of hatchery fish.


The Columbia River and its tributaries in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana have historically been the world's largest producer of chinook, the biggest of the Pacific salmon species.


Scientists had predicted that more than 200,000 chinook salmon would return to the Bonneville Dam east of Portland. But as of Tuesday, only 2,030 had shown up.


"There were a lot of people ... they kind of declared the salmon crisis over," said Buzz Ramsey, a salmon fishing expert who works for a fishing tackle manufacturer. "But that's not the case at all."


Governments have spent billions of dollars to rebuild the population after overfishing, logging, agriculture and development decimated salmon, placing a dozen species on lists of threatened and endangered fish.


Scientists have been unable to explain why so few fish returned this spring.


They have reviewed several theories, such as sea lions eating the salmon or large numbers of smolts dying on the spring migration to the ocean.


But for each theory, there is conflicting information that shows other rivers with the same hazards have normal salmon populations.


"Maybe it's just a little bit of everything adding up," said Bill Tweit, the state's representative on the Columbia River Compact.


The ban is tough on the river's 200 commercial fishermen.


"We don't want to catch the last fish," Bruce Jolma said. "If there is a conservation problem, we are the first ones who want to sit on the beach."


Sport fishing feeds the economies of small towns along the river, as well as tackle makers. Normally, spring chinook attract thousands of anglers who spend an estimated $21.3 million on everything from potato chips to fishing rods.


Ramsey, who speaks and writes about salmon fishing, was disappointed he would not be able to take his sons fishing until the ban is lifted.


"There are other fishing opportunities, I know," he said. "But there are nothing like these Columbia River spring chinook."
 
7x7 thats a silly question, of course they haven't. And by fishing you do mean running a gill net across the river right? Oh I forgot they are trying to rebuild the runs, thats right. How many over there projected harvest did the Makah tribe take this year, like 20,000 fish? I'm sure that was good for maintaining healthy runs.
 
Now, come on, they can't run a gil net all the way across the river, it can only go 1/3rd...
not saying that the tons of nets they put across the river can't alternate though with the assumption that the fish will swim around them.. :rolleyes: :D
 
Of course....the anadromous fish are not in trouble...its all propoganda.

Dont blame the dams...easier to blame gill nets, Indians, sea lions, sport fishermen, and plain old black magic voodoo....

What a freaking joke...

I'm sorry I have to say this...but I told you so.

Wheres Paul? He said there wasnt a problem...I mean his neighbor catches salmon all the time in Idaho... :rolleyes:

Hey Paul, see if your neighbor will give you a salmon from Idaho this year... |oo
 
Gotta be the Indians...... Yeppers, them nets across the Columbia will snag 90+% of the smolts going downstream..

Some of the nets are so big, they even named them....
Lower Granite, Ice Harbor, McNary, etc...etc...
colbasin.jpg
 
Yep...and some of those nets have some pretty tight "mesh"...dont allow a single fish through them!

Gee...I wonder why we dont have any anadromous fish?

Take a wild guess how the fishing is on the Fraser this year????? See also: NO DAMS on the Fraser River...
 
Yes it's pretty sad and pathetic when the federal government seems to have unlimited money and resources to try to fix problems in other countries, yet don't want to do anything to keep our wild salmon runs from going extinct. Sure millions have been spent on studying what can be done to bring the salmon back, but still they do nothing. It really is too bad that we have all these salmon hatcheries...without them there would be no fish to catch, and there would be many more people aware that there actually is a problem. Yes you're right Buzz, it's a joke. |oo
 
WH,

You know whats really sad...1 billion+ has been spent on trying to restore anadromous fish in the Columbia...and the results speak for themselves, as evidenced by this article. More money has been spent on them than any other Threatened or Endangered species. The most ridiculous part is that everyone with at least one firing brain cell knows how to remediate the problem...

Maybe someday we'll luck out and find an administration with brains, balls, and some ambition to "tackle"...no pun intended...the issue of anadromous fish. Until then, expect more of these types of articles.

Watch how the hard core Republican towns like Orifino, Kamiah, Riggins, etc. belly-ache about no fish...yet keep voting for Republicans like Craig, Shrub, etc. They'll get exactly what they deserve this year...not a single anadromous fish. I hope they go broke with no fishing dollars coming in.

The salmon just didnt evaporate into thin-air...they arent there, never made it past the dams to start with.
 
Dams are a problem for fish I don't think anyone would deny that, but there are lots of issues here. I've never seen another endangered species though that allowed so much harvest, be it commercial or tribal. What would returns be like with no harvest? Would they improve? I can't say for sure, just like we can't say that without dams the runs would fully return. You can't give a definite answer at this point.
 
The Tone,

There is NO harvest on Smolts. If you lose the smolts on the way down, you have to worry about the harvest of adults. If you had 10x more smolts make it, you then could have as much harvest as the Indians want and still have 9x more fishing in Idaho.

Blaming the Indians is a waste of time. Why not provide so many adult fish, that they get tired of netting them??
 
They aren't referring to wild fish only so why would the run stop when it has been ok in past years? The dams were there for how long? I would think that the drought up there may have delayed the run this year. The Indians have always had their nets out. Go ahead and call me a fat assed facist but it seems that the dams, Indians and W had little impact on this particular scenario.
 
Ringer,

Study up on the life-cycle of anadromous fish...

Oh, what the hell, I'm bored, and havent had to type a long response for a while...I'll save you the trouble.

Ever since the last dams have went in on the Snake River and ever since dams have been counting anadromous fish on the Columbia...they've never been anything close to historic numbers....when I say, not close, I mean from 30+million fish per year to 1 million or less (most years less).

Since the last dam went in on the Snake...every single run of wild anadromous fish in the Snake River have been listed under the ESA as "threatened".

The Feds promised the people of the Columbia/Snake that the hatcheries would compensate for the lost numbers of anadromous in the system. NOT one time since the agreement has adult return numbers been met. NOT ONCE. The corp, NMFS, etc. assured the Idaho, Washington, Oregon commercial and sport fishermen the hatcheries would more than compensate for the losses of runs and in particular the loss of entire strains of wild fish like those at Grand Coulee and Dworsak, where NO LADDERS were installed. Those runs of fish are history.

It was soon apparent in the mid-70's that something wasnt working....when I say not working, I mean freaking screwed up. The hatcheries were pumping out fish as fast as they could grow them and dumping more and more smolt. Runs still continued to decline, commerical fishing was brought to its knees (estimated 10K lost jobs), sport fishing was all but gone except for the hard-cores.

Then along came the listing and the "techno" fixes...turbine screens, barging smolt, etc. We've been on that route for about 20 years and we still get run returns like this...and will until the real problem is dealt with. I fished salmon on the middle fork Clearwater in 1978 and there was not a season again until 1999...21 years between salmon runs, despite exhaustive monitarily taxing techno fixes on dams. The reason for the strong runs in 1999-2000 were a direct result of an extremely heavy snowpack in W. Montana and Idaho during the winter of 1996-97. That year, the corp had no choice but to release water downstream and smolt survival was decent...not good, decent. That furthered the findings of the PATH report that was calling for dam breaching for smolt survival. Its fair to note that the years between 1978 and 1996 were mostly pretty bad water wise and the corp was not following court orders to release water to flush smolt (they rarely do, despite court cases, etc.). Documented smolt survival was about 1-9% for those years...or 90+% were dead meat each year... adult returns of less than 1% are and were common, despite the turbine screens, barging (which the ISSU determined actually LESSENED adult returns), etc.

What you have now is just business as usual...like I said in another post, I talked with a hatchery manager for Dworsak, while salmon fishing in 2002, and he made the comment that with the corp holding water on the entire system downstream, he may as well have released the smolt into the landfill at Kamiah...

Take a guess what years fish this is??? Yep, average life-cycle of 3 years, you're seeing the results of basically NO smolt getting downstream in 2002 because of the dams and the corp of engineers ignoring court orders...all of course graced by the Shrub Administration.

Bottom line is, without the smolt getting downstream you're screwed, blued, and tatooed.

The problem is, nothing changed from last year, other than this is just back to normal as witnessed by the years between 1978 and 1999.

You get smolt downstream to the ocean, you get adult fish back...it really is just that simple.

What changed is that the last few years of decent runs are a result of decent water years 3-4 years previous, now we're just back to normal...which is the corp screwing with water, lack of water, and 99% smolt mortality.

Wait until 2008, you'll see low numbers of returning adults, pretty low water this year again.
 
Shut up Jose'. Buzz-thanks for the info. You still may get four and five year fish returning. As you know we face the same thing here with fish as the SRP boys own the water and power is the priority. G&F clearly states that recreational fishing is a byproduct of SRP's needs and business. Reality is that democrats held the power for a decade and they didn't do the breaching either so it ain't gonna happen. You guys have some lofty and noble goals but it's still like pissing into the wind on this subject IMO.
 
Back
Top