BackofBeyond
Well-known member
I thought you only hunted deer with a .223?6.5 creedmoor browning Abolt with 140 grain winchester ballistic silvertips
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought you only hunted deer with a .223?6.5 creedmoor browning Abolt with 140 grain winchester ballistic silvertips
Red Loctite will cook out. Use an epoxy.Better use the red stuff though.
The biggest bodied bull I have ever killed, and a hunting buddy had ever helped pack out took a 136 grain hammer almost due north to south and it exited. I have no reason to believe a 123 hammer moving at the same speed wouldn’t yield a very similar result.The idea that an elk can tell the difference between the frontal energy of a 130-140 grain bullet from a .270 and a 130-140 grain bullet from a 6.5 is laughable.
Pencil chub?Would I join the small bullet club if I used a 124 in my RUM? mtmuley
Yeah. Just like that. Just have to have an open mind. mtmuley
I’ve seen a lot of deer shot with a 100 grain ttsx and partitions out of a 257 wby and 25-06. I feel bad for whatever finds it’s way down range of that
Pencil laser dick
Pencil laser dick
That's one way to do it22 Creedmoor 55gr Vmax. Right in the Fudging head.
In your example, the miniscule difference between 6.5 mm and 6.8 mm will not. The huge velocity difference between a creedmoor and 270 will. But to demonstrate how the frontal area of a bullet imparts energy and killing power, we can use Chuck Hawks Rifle Cartridge Killing Power Formula (kps=KExSDxSA(frontal area). Take two loads, creedmoor with 140 accubonds and 308 win with 180 accubonds. Both are heavy for caliber bullets with similar muzzle velocities(~2650fps), section density, and bc with the creedmoor having slight advantage in both. To account for the KE advatange of the 180 v 140 gr bullets, we will use the same value of 2000 ft.lbs. The KPS for the ceedmore is 2000x0.287x0.0547 or 31.4. The KPS for the 308 is 2000x0.271x0.0745 or 40.4. The larger diameter bullet is almost 25% more efficient at killing at the same KE. The real difference is the 308 has 2000 ftlbs at 250 yards while the creedmoor is less than 100. Yes, the creedmoor can kill elk, but there are so many better choices.The idea that an elk can tell the difference between the frontal energy of a 130-140 grain bullet from a .270 and a 130-140 grain bullet from a 6.5 is laughable.
Chuck hawks is all I need to readIn your example, the miniscule difference between 6.5 mm and 6.8 mm will not. The huge velocity difference between a creedmoor and 270 will. But to demonstrate how the frontal area of a bullet imparts energy and killing power, we can use Chuck Hawks Rifle Cartridge Killing Power Formula (kps=KExSDxSA(frontal area). Take two loads, creedmoor with 140 accubonds and 308 win with 180 accubonds. Both are heavy for caliber bullets with similar muzzle velocities(~2650fps), section density, and bc with the creedmoor having slight advantage in both. To account for the KE advatange of the 180 v 140 gr bullets, we will use the same value of 2000 ft.lbs. The KPS for the ceedmore is 2000x0.287x0.0547 or 31.4. The KPS for the 308 is 2000x0.271x0.0745 or 40.4. The larger diameter bullet is almost 25% more efficient at killing at the same KE. The real difference is the 308 has 2000 ftlbs at 250 yards while the creedmoor is less than 100. Yes, the creedmoor can kill elk, but there are so many better choices.
I didn't, but let me clarify:Chuck hawks is all I need to read
Also not sure how you came up with 100ftlbs for the creedbro at 250
I'm a .30 guy but Chuck no way influences me. mtmuleyChuck hawks is all I need to read
Also not sure how you came up with 100ftlbs for the creedbro at 250
Chuck hawks is all I need to read
Also not sure how you came up with 100ftlbs for the creedbro at 250