Retirees whatcha living on?..........

HSA can be used for Medicare and Cobra premiums.
It's a little more complex I think. As I understand it eligibility and penalties are different before you turn 65 and are eligible for Medicare than after. Paying premiums before or after 65 with an HSA isn't illegal per se as I understand it, but there is a penalty and taxes will be due before 65..double whammy. I think after 65 the penalty goes away but taxes may still be due.
 
Credit cards in Alaska may be because of people buying their stuff from Amazon because of the free shipping.
Amazon doesn’t ship most things to ak or at least the things I tried to ship
 
Retiring in 5 years (4 yrs, 10mo, 15dys, but who's counting?). Wife and I will both have military and Federal Civilian pensions. That will be about $120-140K/yr combined. Add in whatever social security is. Plus a million in 401K. Should be about $15K/month without touching the 401K. Retirement income will be roughly 60% of working income.
Wife and I will both start drawing SS at 62 as we both have good pensions and will not depend on SS to get by. If I knew I was going to live to 95 I'd wait, but my luck is I go early.

Will have about 7 years left on the mortgage. Living in Arkansas with relatively low cost of living. Major expenses to be cut out are flying for fun and probably less international travel.
Will be interested to see how my retired bring home compares to my working bring home. Will be paying considerably less taxes and not contributing to retirement, so maybe closer than I think.
 
Last edited:
Retiring in 5 years (4 yrs, 10mo, 15dys, but who's counting?). Wife and I will both have military and Federal Civilian pensions. That will be about $120-140K/yr combined. Add in whatever social security is. Plus a million in 401K. Should be about $15K/month without touching the 401K. Retirement income will be roughly 60% of working income.
Wife and I will both start drawing SS at 62 as we both have good pensions and will not depend on SS to get by. If I knew I was going to live to 95 I'd wait, but my luck is I go early.

Will have about 7 years left on the mortgage. Living in Arkansas with relatively low cost of living. Major expenses to be cut out are flying for fun and probably less international travel.
Will be interested to see how my retired bring home compares to my working bring home. Will be paying considerably less taxes and not contributing to retirement, so maybe closer than I think.
Just a suggestion--you certainly appear to have enough flexibility to do it the way you want--but might want to investigate how things work out if you draw from your 401K and delay at least one of your SS payments. We found drawing a bit more from our retirement funds early, delaying my SS to 65 if not more, then drawing less from our retirement funds after I take my SS gave use the most money down the line.

See the below--very conservative numbers plugged in --good chance you can do better on return after inflation--and I have you living to 95--if you are sure you won't make it that long, you can withdraw more...

1739459255703.png
 
Wife and I will both start drawing SS at 62 as we both have good pensions and will not depend on SS to get by. If I knew I was going to live to 95 I'd wait, but my luck is I go early.
Question. If you aren't going to depend on it why start taking it at the earliest? If you start taking payments from your 401 first you can hold off a few years and then start taking SS when the amount goes up due to your retirement age. Even a couple years delay will boost the amount over taking it at the earliest you are eligible.
 
To me, the question of when you take SS vs taking out of 401K is simply a math exercise of how much SS will increase from say, 62 to 65, vs how much 401K will increase in those 3 years. You will know the SS increase, you will have to make some assumptions on the 401K. But it is a worthwhile exercise.
 
Possibly to answer your question, at a certain age approaching geriatric status the concern of longevity kicks in and with it the attitude of "Hell, we don't even buy green bananas!"
Yeah, I get that. But at the same time they have a million in the 401. PLENTY to draw from for a few years allowing the SS payments to climb. Then they could reduce 401 withdrawals once SS kicks in and still have a nice nest egg in reserve. With his current projected monthly income, minus the SS payments, they may not even have to touch the 401 right away and still have a nice income. Expected monetary needs are his business and none of us can tell him the best way to go. Just looking at options.
 
To me, the question of when you take SS vs taking out of 401K is simply a math exercise of how much SS will increase from say, 62 to 65, vs how much 401K will increase in those 3 years. You will know the SS increase, you will have to make some assumptions on the 401K. But it is a worthwhile exercise.
Its more than that. Assuming you trust SS will still be there for you at the same levels in the future at least--a real question given the current administrations stated goals--I still think its darn near untouchable, at least not without dire political consequences. The concern comes in with someone in charge who does not care one bit about political consequences.

Absent that worry, SS is a known guaranteed amount that has the added advantage of having a built in COLA. Retirement advisors routinely advise folks to prioritize guaranteed money over money that is less certain. Pensions and SS are in a "certain" bucket.

There are calculators that can help determine the best time to take SS but the norm is to try and delay if possible, followed by taking the one that pays the least first and delaying the one that pays the most (if you are a couple).
 
Yeah, I get that. But at the same time they have a million in the 401. PLENTY to draw from for a few years allowing the SS payments to climb. Then they could reduce 401 withdrawals once SS kicks in and still have a nice nest egg in reserve. With his current projected monthly income, minus the SS payments, they may not even have to touch the 401 right away and still have a nice income. Expected monetary needs are his business and none of us can tell him the best way to go. Just looking at options.
Agree--the calculation I posted earlier was designed to help with that. More to it but those calculators are pretty useful IMO. Likely they could withdraw less from the 401K to hit the same target they want and still not reduce the balance of the 401K by much if at all--even assuming a low market return and high inflation.
 
To me, the question of when you take SS vs taking out of 401K is simply a math exercise of how much SS will increase from say, 62 to 65, vs how much 401K will increase in those 3 years. You will know the SS increase, you will have to make some assumptions on the 401K. But it is a worthwhile exercise.
I wish it was that simple. It depends on what type of accounts you have you money in and how to withdraw it to minimize Income. There is a lot of tax pain if you go over the limits. The numbers change and the tax laws may (will?) even change. This is the advantage of a Roth and why many people withdrawn the funds from the 401K, take the income tax hit and then plow it into a Roth before they take SS.

Here is a snippet from TRowe that helps explain. Almost any FA/Broker has a similar summary.

Screenshot 2025-02-13 at 10.20.52 AM.png

 
I wish it was that simple. It depends on what type of accounts you have you money in and how to withdraw it to minimize Income. There is a lot of tax pain if you go over the limits. The numbers change and the tax laws may (will?) even change. This is the advantage of a Roth and why many people withdrawn the funds from the 401K, take the income tax hit and then plow it into a Roth before they take SS.

Here is a snippet from TRowe that helps explain. Almost any FA/Broker has a similar summary.

View attachment 360522

New laws have pushed RMD's way out though--mid 70's I think.

Never could figure it out, but I know some folks will cost themselves money to avoid taxes.

Lots of considerations to take into account but for the average middle class person Roth may be the wrong answer for all of their retirement funds, that is if maximizing income is the objective. Remember to take state taxes into account too! SS may not be taxed at all at the state level in some states. Mine recently changed to where we may pay little to no tax on our SS income.
 
New laws have pushed RMD's way out though--mid 70's I think.

Never could figure it out, but I know some folks will cost themselves money to avoid taxes.

Lots of considerations to take into account but for the average middle class person Roth may be the wrong answer for all of their retirement funds, that is if maximizing income is the objective. Remember to take state taxes into account too! SS may not be taxed at all at the state level in some states. Mine recently changed to where we may pay little to no tax on our SS income.
State taxes vary. The above is Fed. I guess my point was that taxes on SS can be very high and that Roth withdrawals don't count as income so money can be taken out and not affect the calculation on taxes for SS. It isn't just a game of taxes today vs taxes tomorrow. It's a game of minimizing taxable income to avoid a tax penalty on SS. Some people work part time while drawing SS and at the end of the year discover a big tax hit because they were $1 over the income threshold level.
 
Question. If you aren't going to depend on it why start taking it at the earliest? If you start taking payments from your 401 first you can hold off a few years and then start taking SS when the amount goes up due to your retirement age. Even a couple years delay will boost the amount over taking it at the earliest you are eligible.


And if I die at 64?
The 401K is a transferable asset and SS is not. The breakeven age for waiting even a few years on SS depends on you living a long life. I'm in healthcare and realize that's not a given. I will be drawing the max rate whatever year I start, and honestly the difference isn't that great, I'll start drawing at 62 and it will start earning interest in another transferable asset.

Again, my strategy would be different if I was dependent on SS. My pensions won't run out like people only depending on savings. My strategy would also be fine tuned if I knew how long my wife and I will both live. I've seen far to many healthy people in their mid 50s not make it to their 60s.

I am not dependent on SS and have no idea if and when it will go away or how long I will live. I'll start drawing at 62 and put it in the bank for later, if there is a later. Regardless, we will do quite well in retirement whatever we do.
 
Last edited:
And if I die at 64?
The 401K is a transferable asset and SS is not. The breakeven age for waiting even a few years on SS depends on you living a long life. I'm in healthcare and realize that's not a given. I will be drawing the max rate whatever year I start, and honestly the difference isn't that great, I'll start drawing at 62 and it will start earning interest in another transferable asset.

Again, my strategy would be different if I was dependent on SS. My pensions won't run out like people only depending on savings. My strategy would also be fine tuned if I knew how long my wife and I will both live. I've seen far to many healthy people in their mid 50s not make it to their 60s.

I am not dependent on SS and have no idea if and when it will go away or how long I will live. I'll start drawing at 62 and put it in the bank for later, if there is a later. Regardless, we will do quite well in retirement whatever we do.

Another aspect of this is generational wealth and what it really means. My Grandparents estate paid for my children to go to college free and allowed my parents to pay off their home before retirement. If I receive money from my parents (which is most likely), it will go toward my grandchildrens benefit. Whatever I pass on will continue the trend. Eventually someone will squander the gift, but for those who take advantage of it it's a real step up. My daughter went through private college and medical school debt free.

I don't plan to use the 401K for monthly expenses. More of a savings account for large ticket items, like when the HVAC goes out. I didn't save the money for the purpose of transferring it, but when you start out ahead of the curve it makes it an option.

The future is a gamble whatever decisions you make. The ability to adapt when it doesn't go as planned will be key. If nothing else I'll move into my daughters pool house and mooch off her.
 
Last edited:
And if I die at 64?
The 401K is a transferable asset and SS is not. The breakeven age for waiting even a few years on SS depends on you living a long life. I'm in healthcare and realize that's not a given. I will be drawing the max rate whatever year I start, and honestly the difference isn't that great, I'll start drawing at 62 and it will start earning interest in another transferable asset.

Again, my strategy would be different if I was dependent on SS. My pensions won't run out like people only depending on savings. My strategy would also be fine tuned if I knew how long my wife and I will both live. I've seen far to many healthy people in their mid 50s not make it to their 60s.

I am not dependent on SS and have no idea if and when it will go away or how long I will live. I'll start drawing at 62 and put it in the bank for later, if there is a later. Regardless, we will do quite well in retirement whatever we do.
If I remember correctly the break even to make up for what you'd receive taking SS at 62 vs 67 was like mid 70's. How confident is anyone that they will make it to 75? Odds are around 50%, I plan on retiring and drawing at 62. Somebody on here says that I'll probably run out of health before money and I plan on using at least some of the governments money in my retirement, lord knows I've paid in an awful lot.
 
Gastro Gnome - Eat Better Wherever

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,754
Messages
2,070,727
Members
36,733
Latest member
Staceykorn
Back
Top