Advertisement

Relax, Everything is Going to be Okay!

Where private ventures such as ski resorts have been allowed on public land, is that a bad thing?
Private ownership, no. PE control and ownership, absolutely. Skiing in the US used to be the envy of the world, now it's a complete chit show. Soulless, cookie cutter, impersonal experience.
 
Instead of demanding that my newest employee justify his existence by sending me a list of 5 things he did last week, I had he and his wife over for dinner. Red meat sampler (beef filet, venison blackstrap and Japanese A5 Wagyu ribeye) with tortellini in pesto sauce, steamed broccoli and salad. Tiramisu for dessert. I’ve found that treating people with respect and letting them know you care about them is a far superior way to maximize performance. YMMV.

View attachment 362043View attachment 362044
Couldn't agree more! I don't have a single employee that hasn't had dinner at my house at least once. Never fed them wagyu though I don't like them that much 🤣.
 
I mentioned things were getting Orwellian in another post, people thought it was a dramatic over reaction.

Well here's more evidence...



The White House said on Tuesday it would decide which media organizations participate in the press pool that covers the president, wresting control away from the group of journalists that has done so for decades.
The move follows the Trump administration's decision to bar the Associated Press from being in the press pool because it has declined to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America, the name Trump has assigned the body of water, or update its widely followed stylebook to reflect such a change.
"This move tears at the independence of a free press in the United States. It suggests the government will choose the journalists who cover the president. In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps," WHCA President Eugene Daniels said in a statement.
 
You can't use chainsaws in wilderness.

Musk could direct his ire toward the corpulent, degenerate reptiles that are the legislative branch of govt. They have created the financial "cliff" with reckless spending.

And yet, those ghouls cheer when someone making $40K gets fired because they are in probationary status.

There will certainly be unintended consequences from all this, what they are we will find out.
No shit, sherlock.

That whoosh you heard was the earlier discussion of the "default" phenomenon of .gov workers, flying over you. "We can't do that, because we've always done it otherwise".

Let's fast-forward from 1938 to now, where those individuals now tasked with wilderness trail are supported by modern safety standards and compensated with more than subsistence food and shelter, in comparison to the CCC era where many/most of said trails were installed. Seems to me like we can't afford as many folks to do that work as we could back then. Also seems to me that, as with any other hazardous work since, productivity has lessened due to evolution in personnel safety management (I can't wait for some clown to claim that I'm saying that's a bad thing...). With the changing of the times needs to come a changing of the means. Goodbye Simonds crosscut, hello Husky.

Burn it all down, and rebuild with a mindset of safety, efficiency, and wholesale slaughter of sacred cattle.
 
Heard from one of nephews and niece today...He's an air traffic controller. She's an MD specializing in infectious diseases for the CDC .

Both got the memo to justify their jobs today...so much for air traffic controllers being exempt I guess.
Got more clarity from my brother today.

My niece the infectious disease MD working for the CDC was still on probation, she's been with them for just under 2 years I think.

She was slated to be fired.

They had to appeal on the basis that she has high level security clearance with the military, apparently she's on a CDC first response team that involves the military and others. Had it not been for that she would have been axed. She's on maternity leave now too, just had a baby several months ago.
 
No shit, sherlock.

That whoosh you heard was the earlier discussion of the "default" phenomenon of .gov workers, flying over you. "We can't do that, because we've always done it otherwise".

Let's fast-forward from 1938 to now, where those individuals now tasked with wilderness trail are supported by modern safety standards and compensated with more than subsistence food and shelter, in comparison to the CCC era where many/most of said trails were installed. Seems to me like we can't afford as many folks to do that work as we could back then. Also seems to me that, as with any other hazardous work since, productivity has lessened due to evolution in personnel safety management (I can't wait for some clown to claim that I'm saying that's a bad thing...). With the changing of the times needs to come a changing of the means. Goodbye Simonds crosscut, hello Husky.

Burn it all down, and rebuild with a mindset of safety, efficiency, and wholesale slaughter of sacred cattle.
Well, you'd have to repeal, or pass a law repealing parts of, the Wilderness Act, since the language for no motors (or wheels) is detailed therein. And you can't do that by stroking an Executive Order, so you'd be reliant on the aforementioned reptiles (Congress) to do their jobs, which, it's become obvious, they are incapable of.
 
I mentioned things were getting Orwellian in another post, people thought it was a dramatic over reaction.

Well here's more evidence...



The White House said on Tuesday it would decide which media organizations participate in the press pool that covers the president, wresting control away from the group of journalists that has done so for decades.
The move follows the Trump administration's decision to bar the Associated Press from being in the press pool because it has declined to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America, the name Trump has assigned the body of water, or update its widely followed stylebook to reflect such a change.
"This move tears at the independence of a free press in the United States. It suggests the government will choose the journalists who cover the president. In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps," WHCA President Eugene Daniels said in a statement.
Control the messaging. First step in an authoritarian government.
 
I mentioned things were getting Orwellian in another post, people thought it was a dramatic over reaction.

Well here's more evidence...



The White House said on Tuesday it would decide which media organizations participate in the press pool that covers the president, wresting control away from the group of journalists that has done so for decades.
The move follows the Trump administration's decision to bar the Associated Press from being in the press pool because it has declined to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America, the name Trump has assigned the body of water, or update its widely followed stylebook to reflect such a change.
"This move tears at the independence of a free press in the United States. It suggests the government will choose the journalists who cover the president. In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps," WHCA President Eugene Daniels said in a statement.
A cursory internet search shows that the past two presidents have barred or banned media outlets from press conferences. Next thing you know, Trump will weaponize the DOJ to coerce social media outlets into removing content they don't like.
 
Do you know what GAOA program even does?
It doesn't matter for two reasons. The first is that if my understanding is different from yours, mine will be wrong. The second is that my understanding, or lack thereof, has nothing to do with the answer to the question.
 
A cursory internet search show that the past two presidents have barred or banned media outlets from press conferences. Next thing you know, Trump will weaponize the DOJ to coerce social media outlets into removing content they don't like.
Which was terrible, but why then go all, "hold my beer" and take it to the next level? I thought they were the free speech champions? Was that a lie?
 
It doesn't matter for two reasons. The first is that if my understanding is different from yours, mine will be wrong. The second is that my understanding, or lack thereof, has nothing to do with the answer to the question.
I guess the difference is I actually work on GAOA funded projects so I know what the funding was intended to address. There is no interpretation, the goal was pretty clear.
 
A cursory internet search shows that the past two presidents have barred or banned media outlets from press conferences. Next thing you know, Trump will weaponize the DOJ to coerce social media outlets into removing content they don't like.
A cursory internet search will also show the Supreme court decision on the social media case. Might want to check into it.
 
Been ALL over the news....




The articles say considering??? No promise yet. Cant wait to get one and use the funds hunting trip related
 
You can't use chainsaws in wilderness.

Musk could direct his ire toward the corpulent, degenerate reptiles that are the legislative branch of govt. They have created the financial "cliff" with reckless spending.

And yet, those ghouls cheer when someone making $40K gets fired because they are in probationary status.

There will certainly be unintended consequences from all this, what they are we will find out.
Maybe for official approved trail clearing chainsaws should be allowed in the wilderness to save time and labor?? What is the down side?
 
You can get a gold card and your good.
Screw America,I got mine.
I love the gold card idea. I am sure there is down side to consider and comment. However, I hope we sell a million Gold cards at $5M. Heck the guys in charge the last for years let them in for free, gave them plane tickets to the big cities and housed them in posh hotels all on the tax payers dime. Scary when someone in such deep debt just keeps giving money away and free spending. This seems like a good idea to bring revenue in to help pay down the debt!
 
Caribou Gear

Forum statistics

Threads
114,865
Messages
2,074,493
Members
36,784
Latest member
lionelramsy4
Back
Top