That is not what I believe or what my post was intended to convey. It became apparent that there were those that would see my critique of public policy that way. It was nothing to do with any person. I removed all commentary and it is simply a news report now. Do with the information as you see fit.
PRIDE Month Celebtrations at Public Land Management Agencies
- Thread starter Harold357
- Start date
- Status
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Addicting
Well-known member
But that was the best part. How are you and @Greenhorn going to converse if you don’t openly share?
My opinion is not relevent and I not wish to discuss my thoughts at this time. The PRIDE information and its importance to public land management can be found at USDA, Dept of Interior, and Dept of Energy websites. As I noted, more official information on the topic will likely be released this month.
Has a single post on this forum been made about the forest services equity action plan? It's been out for like a year now. Why is it a grenade?
perma
Well-known member
Welcome to HT
Receiving criticism is not something that concerns me. My goal was to not create additional problems for other users or moderators. That is why I removed opinion from my post.
Addicting
Well-known member
Sexual choice has no bearing on public land policy. This agenda is as dumb as Joe wanting to sniff people.
Last edited:
perma
Well-known member
Ok, I would have also accepted “thank you” as a reply.
I understand you may be trying to get this thread locked. But USFS, BLM, and DOI all have lengthy documentation and official policy that contradict your statement.
Addicting
Well-known member
So if I’m Gay my input towards the multi use policy is worth less than if I was straight? Hence why we need to emphasize it?
Why would my comment to public officials on any source of communication need to include my sexual preferences?
Why would my comment to public officials on any source of communication need to include my sexual preferences?
rjthehunter
Well-known member
So... the LTBGQUILMNOPQURS care about public lands?
I thought they were more focused on parades, marches, and rainbows.
This seems like an irrelevant way to talk about gays.
I thought they were more focused on parades, marches, and rainbows.
This seems like an irrelevant way to talk about gays.
I think we should just leave the content of this thread to relevent updates to public land management agencies PRIDE month celebrations and not opinions. I am not going to respond to your question because like I said The goal is not generate a problem for other forum users. There is plenty of documentation on the topic available at different agency websites. If you have questions you truly want answered please pm and I will provide you the links that may help.
Last edited:
Addicting
Well-known member
rjthehunter
Well-known member
noharleyyet
Well-known member
LuketheDog
Well-known member
Here is a helpful link to answer why PRIDE month is relevent to both the public land management and resource discussion in addition to the development of clean energy resources on public land by the Biden Administration. Again, I would like to stress that these are not my opinion. I am simply providing links the available resources to answer your questions.
www.doi.gov
Advancing Environmental Justice | U.S. Department of the Interior
The Biden-Harris administration has mobilized an all-of-government approach to advance environmental justice. As directed in Executive Order 14008, Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad, the Department of the Interior has partnered with agencies across the federal government to develop...
- Status
Similar threads
