Actually you would think in todays day and age that there was some kind of profit in it. lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually you would think in todays day and age that there was some kind of profit in it. lol
My bil’s sister 100% no joke had this happen.
If I was on a jury and this was the case, I would say:
We have a picture of a guy in camo
We have a picture of a live moose
We have a picture of a dead moose
What we don’t have is any proof…
You forget, there has been no prosecution, but he has been convicted here. I am not his defense counsel, I just see that without the trial and due process, he has been convicted.Yes, but someone dumb enough to get close enough to shoot a moose with a bow either on accident thinking it's an elk or on purpose because he's a jerk, is also someone who will likely also quickly cave under a light cross examination by the prosecutor.
Did you eat Ben lambs brownies?You forget, there has been no prosecution, but he has been convicted here. I am not his defense counsel, I just see that without the trial and due process, he has been convicted.
If he did it, throw him in jail and find the piss out of him, but there needs to be more evidence than what this jury has been given to convict him on…
You do realize there could he a whole lot more evidence this guy did kill the moose but CPW has not put it out- right?If I was on a jury and this was the case, I would say:
We have a picture of a guy in camo
We have a picture of a live moose
We have a picture of a dead moose
What we don’t have is any proof…
When he is proven guilty, he needs to be dealt with accordingly, until then the conviction that has been given him in this board is the issue I am addressing. I don’t support law breaking, but I do think due process needs to be exercised before the conviction…
he's a person of interest. throwing the person of interest's face on the internet could definitely lead to more damning evidence, if not a confession.
Due process protects you from the government, not internet hunting forumsYou do realize there could he a whole lot more evidence this guy did kill the moose but CPW has not put it out- right?
“Could” will not get you a conviction. The story is incomplete, the killing of the moose is deplorable, but to jump to the absolute certainty that this guy is the poacher, is still premature.
The lead in on the story states:
CPW seeks public's help in identifying archer who poached a bull moose in Teller County
Then they ran the picture of the archer which gives you a perception that he is the poacher, and he may very well be. There is a high probability that he is, but I just withhold my judgement until the evidence proves he is such.
When he is proven guilty, he needs to be dealt with accordingly, until then the conviction that has been given him in this board is the issue I am addressing. I don’t support law breaking, but I do think due process needs to be exercised before the conviction…
Ya like I said CPW could have more evidence they have not put out yet. "perception" will not get you off.You do realize there could he a whole lot more evidence this guy did kill the moose but CPW has not put it out- right?
“Could” will not get you a conviction. The story is incomplete, the killing of the moose is deplorable, but to jump to the absolute certainty that this guy is the poacher, is still premature.
The lead in on the story states:
CPW seeks public's help in identifying archer who poached a bull moose in Teller County
Then they ran the picture of the archer which gives you a perception that he is the poacher, and he may very well be. There is a high probability that he is, but I just withhold my judgement until the evidence proves he is such.
When he is proven guilty, he needs to be dealt with accordingly, until then the conviction that has been given him in this board is the issue I am addressing. I don’t support law breaking, but I do think due process needs to be exercised before the conviction…
Of course you are just making that statement arbitrarily, as I never suggested such a thing…Ya like I said CPW could have more evidence they have not put out yet. "perception" will not get you off.
Saying for certain he did not do it off an incomplete story is just silly.
No evidence has been presented that tjones said you did. How dare you be so blatant as to pass judgment without the evidence presented. You can't convict someone in your own mind like that.Of course you are just making that statement arbitrarily, as I never suggested such a thing…
This.If I was on a jury and this was the case, I would say:
We have a picture of a guy in camo
We have a picture of a live moose
We have a picture of a dead moose
What we don’t have is any proof…
You forget, there has been no prosecution, but he has been convicted here. I am not his defense counsel, I just see that without the trial and due process, he has been convicted.
If he did it, throw him in jail and fine the piss out of him, but there needs to be more evidence than what this jury has been given to convict him on…
| |||||||||||
|