Outfitters unofficially back anti-wolf lawsuit

[Ithaca 37]

The Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition has been a miserable failure so far at raising money. Talk's cheap and all those big mouthed wolf haters are tighter than the bark on a tree.

Let's hear from the guys here in SI. How much have you contributed to the Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition?

 

[Ten Bears]

$0, these guys don't even return your call if you question their motives in the least.

They do have some laughable buper stickers though.

 

[Michaelr]

Outfitters unofficially back anti-wolf lawsuit

By JEFF GEARINO Southwest Wyoming bureau




GREEN RIVER -- Wyoming Outfitters and Guides Association members are closely watching anti-wolf group's efforts to sue the government over wolf reintroduction in Idaho and will consider offering financial support.

The Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition is trying to raise money to fund a class-action lawsuit asking the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to eliminate wolves from Idaho.

A lot of WOGA members support the lawsuit and hope it succeeds, Afton outfitter and WOGA member Maury Jones said in an interview.

"We're definitely watching this ... we're on their side emotionally, but we haven't had time to get together collectively and decide what we're going to do ... whether we're going to donate some money or what," Jones said.

"We would like to sign onto the suit, yes, but I'm speaking unofficially here ... that's after talking to some of the guys," he said.

"Frankly, wolves are not only going to destroy the outfitting industry, they're also going to destroy Wyoming's wildlife," Jones said. "We would love to see the suit be successful.. not just because we're wishing and hoping, but because we honestly believe the Endangered Species Act (ESA) has been violated in numerous ways" with wolf introduction.

Coalition founder Ron Gillett of Stanley, Idaho said in a phone interview the lawsuit aims to force federal officials to dispose of the animals through any means necessary.

He said organizations in Montana and Idaho share that sentiment and the coalition hopes they will join in the lawsuit. Several Montana groups in particular, Gillett said, have indicated they will support the suit.

He said coalition is gathering funds from a variety of sources and has scheduled a dinner/auction Aug. 22 in Nampa, Idaho, in an effort to raise $50,000 to help fund the suit. He said the group hopes to file the suit by the spring of 2004.

The group consists of a variety of interests, he said, including cattle ranchers, sheep producers, sportsmen, outfitters "and anybody who is being impacted or sees what this gray wolf is doing to this state and its rural economy."

Gillett said the anti-wolf coalition would gladly welcome any support from Wyoming's outfitters, though they haven't received any official support from any organization in Wyoming yet. "Maury and other outfitters are the kinds of guys we want to get on the team," he said.

The latest federal and tribal estimates show Idaho's wolf population at about 285 animals and Wyoming's wolf population at over 300 animals. But Gillett said the population could be several hundred wolves higher.

Gillett said the coalition earlier this year hired environmental policy researcher Helen Franklin to assist with the suit. Jones said the WOGA has met and discussed the wolf situation with Franklin and also donated some money to help fund the position.

Both men said a key point of the suit will be the plaintiff's contention that the gray wolf is not native to the region. "Its Canadian and there's no evidence the Canadian gray wolf ever inhabited Wyoming," Jones said.

The WOGA has been involved in other wildlife-related lawsuits. In 2000, the WOGA lost a lawsuit the organization filed against the Game and Fish Commission that challenged Wyoming's hunting license distribution system.

The suit sought to overturn the state's method for distributing deer and elk licenses to out-of-state hunters, but a federal judge ruled that the state's system did not unconstitutionally impinge on the rights of nonresident hunters and resident outfitters.
http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2003/08/18/news/wyoming/99b6b9 d8fd6cab1520100e7eebe83466.txt

 

[JoseCuervo]

Hey Michael,

That article you posted is 20 days old. You think the WOGA would have been able to make a decision yet? How about an update???


I did run into a guy last week who was at the Nampa banquet for the Anti-Wolf group. He claimed he was on the "Board of Directors" of the group. I didn't ask for any verification, but he did have a Fat-Ass, so I assumed he was a director.

He claimed (and this is all heresay) that they had over 300 people at the banquet, and they thought it was a success. He said they are going to change the name of the organization, as the Anti-Wolf name is too offensive. They want something more deceiptful, in order to make people think they are protecting Idaho's wildlife.

He also said they are "reigning in Ron Gillett" and not going to have him commenting on things. (Again, this is heresay, so I can't say if it is the truth or not, but hell, this is the Internet...

)

They have found an attorney in Boise, who will take the suit all the way to the Supreme Court for $250,000 flat fee. And they want to get the Wyoming and Montana groups to join them, so they can move the suit out of the 9th Circuit Court.

Who knows if it is true, but I thought I would pass the information along.

 

[Ithaca 37]

Even the other anti-wolf wackos think Ron Gillet is a looney tune!