dustinf
Active member
Please provide us with something, anything even remotely positive that Obama has done or is responsible for while he's occupied the Oval office.
He ordered a ground assault in Pakistan to kill Bin Laden.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please provide us with something, anything even remotely positive that Obama has done or is responsible for while he's occupied the Oval office.
Dustin, actually he didn't. The Secretary of Defense went behind Obama's back and gave the order to go into Pakistan and the order to kill or capture Bin Laden. This was verified by Obama's own #1 adviser, Valerie Jarrett who stated that Obama didn't even know of the assault until he and his cabinet were assembled to watch it on a live satellite feed.
So, anything?
A little off topic but I remember how the Bush critics say we had no right going into Iraq because there was no proof of weapons of mass destruction. They make is sound like it was the only reason we sent troops there and we had no right to go there. Now the same Bush bashers are Obama supporters go right along with Obama because Syria used chem weapons and that is such a big deal so that makes it O.K.
So one would have to ask the Bush bashers, ever heard of "Chemical Ali" ???
Just sayin....
Why do Obama supporters always refuse to acknowledge news events and without fail want anything that disputes their claims to be supported by some sort of link or source? Hell, it was front page news that even the NY Times, Washington Post, and even NBC ran with at the time. You want sources, you have the same access to Google, that everyone else has! When the truth about your messiah isn't what you want to believe, look it up your self!!!!!!!!
I'm pretty certain there are at least a dozen people who have read this thread that remember and haven't forgotten those comments coming from Obozo's own people. Also, there is a current ex-Seal Team Six commander quoting those same sources in a book and on his national tour (his name escapes me, but I just received a mailing from him this past week, which is one of the items that brought the memories of Valerie Jarret's announcement back to mind).
I stand by my post, and if you want to refute it, you spend your own time looking for the links.
With rthomas entering the game this things got legs, 10 pages at least.
Dang I miss Jose.
Dustin, actually he didn't. The Secretary of Defense went behind Obama's back and gave the order to go into Pakistan and the order to kill or capture Bin Laden. This was verified by Obama's own #1 adviser, Valerie Jarrett who stated that Obama didn't even know of the assault until he and his cabinet were assembled to watch it on a live satellite feed.
So, anything?
http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2012/10/18/breaking-obama-did-not-make-the-decision-on-bin-laden/
...or are you looking for MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc to share something off their agenda?
I hate myself for getting involved.
Please stay on this one. Always fun to watch to watch rhomas in action.
A little off topic but I remember how the Bush critics say we had no right going into Iraq because there was no proof of weapons of mass destruction. They make is sound like it was the only reason we sent troops there and we had no right to go there. Now the same Bush bashers are Obama supporters go right along with Obama because Syria used chem weapons and that is such a big deal so that makes it O.K.
So one would have to ask the Bush bashers, ever heard of "Chemical Ali" ???
Just sayin....
Schmalts - not trying to get involved in this discussion but there is a world of difference between invading Iraq to effect "regime change" and lobbing a few cruise missiles at targets in Syria.