One perspective not seen in SI often enough

Wally Dog

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 26, 2002
Messages
1,289
Location
Boise,Idaho
As well as I can check this out on the internet the writer is legitimate and is the author of this letter.


I was sitting alone in one of those loud, casual steak houses that you find all over the country. You know the type--a bucket of peanuts on every table, shells littering the floor, and a bunch of perky college kids racing around with longneck beers and sizzling platters.

Taking a sip of my iced tea, I studied the crowd over the rim of my glass. My gaze lingered on a group enjoying their meal. They wore no uniform to identify their branch of service, but they were definitely "military:" clean shaven, cropped haircut, and that "squared away" look that comes with pride.

Smiling sadly, I glanced across my table to the empty seat where my husband usually sat. It had only been a few months since we sat in this very booth, talking about his upcoming deployment to the Middle East. That was when he made me promise to get a sitter for the kids, come back to this restaurant once a month and treat myself to a nice steak. In turn he would treasure the thought of me being here, thinking about him until he returned home to me.

I fingered the little flag pin I constantly wear and wondered where he was at this very moment. Was he safe and warm? Was his cold any better? Were my letters getting through to him? As I pondered these thoughts, high pitched female voices from the next booth broke into my thoughts.

"I don't know what Bush is thinking about. Invading Iraq. You'd think that man would learn from his old man's mistakes. Good lord. What an idiot! I can't believe he is even in office. You do know, he stole the election."

I cut into my steak and tried to ignore them, as they began an endless tirade running down our president. I thought about the last night I spent with my husband, as he prepared to deploy. He had just returned from getting his smallpox and anthrax shots. The image of him standing in our kitchen packing his gas mask still gives me chills.

Once again the women's voices invaded my thoughts. "It is all about oil, you know. Our soldiers will go in and rape and steal all the oil they can in the name of 'freedom'. Hmph! I wonder how many innocent people they'll kill without giving it a thought? It's pure greed, you know."


My chest tightened as I stared at my wedding ring. I could still see how handsome my husband looked in his "mess dress" the day he slipped it on my finger. I wondered what he was wearing now. Probably his desert uniform, affectionately dubbed "coffee stains" with a heavy bulletproof vest over it.

"You know, we should just leave Iraq alone. I don't think they are hiding any weapons. In fact, I bet it's all a big act just to increase the president's popularity. That's all it is, padding the military budget at the expense of our social security and education. And, you know what else? We're just asking for another 9-ll. I can't say when it happens again that we didn't deserve it."

Their words brought to mind the war protesters I had watched gathering outside our base. Did no one appreciate the sacrifice of brave men and women, who leave their homes and family to ensure our freedom? Do they even know what "freedom" is?

I glanced at the table where the young men were sitting, and saw their courageous faces change. They had stopped eating and looked at each other dejectedly, listening to the women talking.

"Well, I, for one, think it's just deplorable to invade Iraq, and I am certainly sick of our tax dollars going to train professional baby killers we call a military."

Professional baby killers? I thought about what a wonderful father my husband is, and of how long it would be before he would see our children again.

That's it! Indignation rose up inside me. Normally reserved, pride in my husband gave me a brassy boldness I never realized I had. Tonight one voice will answer on behalf of our military, and let her pride in our troops be known.

Sliding out of my booth, I walked around to the adjoining booth and placed my hands flat on their table. Lowering myself to eye level with them, I smilingly said, "I couldn't help overhearing your conversation.

You see, I'm sitting here trying to enjoy my dinner alone. And, do you know why? Because my husband, whom I love with all my heart, is halfway around the world defending your right to say rotten things about him."

"Yes, you have the right to your opinion, and what you think is none of my business. However, what you say in public is something else, and I will not sit by and listen to you ridicule MY country, MY president, MY husband, and all the other fine American men and women who put their lives on the line, just so you can have the "freedom" to complain. Freedom is an expensive commodity, ladies. Don't let your actions cheapen it."

I must have been louder that I meant to be, because the manager came over to inquire if everything was all right. "Yes, thank you," I replied. Then turning back to the women, I said, "Enjoy the rest of your meal."


As I returned to my booth applause broke out. I was embarrassed for making a scene, and went back to my half eaten steak. The women picked up their check and scurried away.

After finishing my meal, and while waiting for my check, the manager returned with a huge apple cobbler ala mode. "Compliments of those soldiers," he said. He also smiled and said the ladies tried to pay for my dinner, but that another couple had beaten them to it. When I asked who, the manager said they had already left, but that the gentleman was a veteran, and wanted to take care of the wife of "one of our boys."

With a lump in my throat, I gratefully turned to the soldiers and thanked them for the cobbler. Grinning from ear to ear, they came over and surrounded the booth. "We just wanted to thank you, ma'am. You know we can't get into confrontations with civilians, so we appreciate what you did."


As I drove home, for the first time since my husband's deployment, I didn't feel quite so alone. My heart was filled with the warmth of the other diners who stopped by my table, to relate how they, too, were proud of my husband, and would keep him in their prayers. I knew their flags would fly a little higher the next day.

Perhaps they would look for more tangible ways to show their pride in our country, and the military who protect her. And maybe, just maybe, the two women who were railing against our country, would pause for a minute to appreciate all the freedom America offers, and the price it pays to maintain it's freedom.

As for me, I have learned that one voice CAN make a difference. Maybe the next time protesters gather outside the gates of the base where I live, I will proudly stand on the opposite side with a sign of my own. It will simply say, "Thank You!"

(*Lori Kimble is a 31 year old teacher and proud military wife. A California native, Mrs. Kimble currently lives in Alabama. She also is a contributor to the Washington Post. You can check her out on the Internet.)


To those who fought for our Nation: Freedom has a flavor the protected will never know. GOD BLESS AMERICA!
 
Thanks Wally Dog. You know all the times I was away from the family the base personnel, USAF, etc always did a great job of taking care of me. Sometimes I forgot that my wife and daughters actually had it harder at home. They too serve who wait at home. God bless our troops and their families.
 
Uh Oh!! :(

As we explained in a previous version of this page, we could verify only that Lori Kimble is a real person, that she is the author of this piece, and that she asserts it is based upon a real incident. The article contains no details by which it can be independently verified, and our attempts to elicit more information from the author about when and where the events described took place received no response. We note now that the publishers have removed the article from the Washington Dispatch's web site because they, too, have been unable to verify its truthfulness and have been unable to obtain more information from its author:

This article as been removed from the archives as questions have arisen regarding its validity. The author has been contacted on numerous occasions but has refused to provide any material that could resolve the issue
Last updated: 22 January 2004

The URL for this page is: www.snopes.com/politics/war/speakup.asp

[ 04-30-2004, 07:46: Message edited by: pawclaws ]
 
Ten Beers,

You need to read a bit closer to Paws de-bunking of Ms. Kimble's post. It came from the Washington Dispatch, as Paws stated above. This "commentary" had nothing to do with the Washinton Post, and in fact, was actually removed from the Washington Dispatch, as its' credibility was suspect.

Here is more from the Washington Dispatch providing a position not always seen in SI.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fallujah -- Bush’s Waterloo?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary by Egbert F. Bhatty
April 30, 2004


President George Bush is caught between Fallujah and falling flat on his face.



If he tells the US Army to take Fallujah by force, the bloodbath of civilian casualties will damn him. If he tells them to walk away, his weak surrender will damn him.



How did Bush ever come to this unhappy pass?



The same way he got himself into Iraq – an unthinking, unprovoked action.



Fallujah is a dusty town some 30 miles west of Baghdad, populated mostly with Sunnis. US military operations in Fallujah began April 5 shortly after the killing and mutilation of four American civilian contractors.



Although such private contractors know the risks they are taking [in exchange for salaries in excess of $100,000 per annum] should the US army be in the business of exacting revenge for their deaths?



No. But, the Army decided to use the contractors’ deaths to get some other business done. And, that business was to get at Fallujah.



Fallujah has long been a thorn in the side of the US. It is, and has been, a hotbed of anti-US activity. US troops feel more unsafe in Fallujah than even in Baghdad. So, without too much thought going into the process, and without any provocation at all -- much like Bush’s decision about Iraq a year earlier– the Army decided to go into Fallujah.



“Their deaths will not go unpunished,” said Bush’s proconsul in Iraq, L Paul Bremer, referring to the dead contractors.



The US Army was now no longer engaged in bringing freedom to the Iraqis, or democracy to Iraq. It was now engaged in private retribution.



“We will respond,” said Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt. “It’s going to be deliberate. It will be precise and it will be overwhelming.” That was on April 1, about a month ago.



The progress since then, has, however, been under whelming. And, Bush is in a pickle.



On April 5 some 1,200 US troops sealed off the city. Heavy fighting erupted the next day. Soon there were hundreds of bodies of Iraqi civilians lying in the streets of Fallujah. Estimates put them at over 600. On April 10 the Iraqi Governing Council and the US called for a truce. Protracted negotiations began, and low-level skirmishes continued. On April 19 the US said it would halt military operations, and a shaky ceasefire was established.



Under terms of the peace deal, Fallujah was to surrender all its heavy weapons. On April 21 the city sent out a mix of ancient and unusable artillery – a World War II MG-34 German machine gun, inert RPGs, dud rocket warheads, decrepit mortar shells.



Stung by this contemptuous response, the Marines began to prepare for an all-out assault. But, Bush, fearful of large-scale casualties, both American and Iraqi, in close-combat, urban warfare, held them back. On April 24 Bremer met with Fallujah’s leaders to de-fuse the situation. On April 25, in a significant shift in US policy, Bush, decided to go the political track.



The Islamic militants were to be confronted by joint Marine-Iraqi patrols instead of heavy ordnance.



But, the Islamic militants would have none of anything that the US proposed. On April 26 they repeatedly engaged US forces in intense, if isolated, firefights and, did so again on April 27. This time the US hit back with tank and aircraft fire and, followed this up on April 28 with an intense air assault on the northern, north-western, and western parts of Fallujah using F-15 jet fighters, Cobra attack helicopters, and an AC-130 Spectre gunship. The plan for joint patrols was postponed.



Just before nightfall on April 28 US aircraft dropped white leaflets on Fallujah calling on the Islamic militants to surrender.



But, the only way surrender would happen, and Bush’s political track succeeds, is if there was a carrot out there somewhere.



However, Bush’s Ambassador-designate to Iraq, John Negroponte, is not carrying a carrot. He’s carrying a big gun. “There’s no place for armed groups of this kind in the future of Iraq and they must be dealt with,” he said, ominously. “Sometimes force has to be met with force.”



Bush has no carrot. Negroponte has only a big gun. Just what is the Bush policy here?



For, if flashpoint Fallujah is not satisfactorily de-fused very soon, its repercussions could blow up in President Bush’s face. Seeing the Islamic militant’s successful stand against overwhelming US force in Fallujah, the rest of Iraq – from Basra through Barqubah to Mosul – could go up in flames.



Despite its rolling plains, so suitable for the M1A1 Abrams main battle tank, there is going to be no decisive [Bush’s favorite word] battle anywhere in Iraq to secure Bush’s election. Instead, the decisive test of President Bush’s entire Presidency will come down to this small, dusty town west of Baghdad.



At Fallujah, will Bush be able to avoid his Waterloo?
 
I stand corrected.

Washington Dispatch (spineless too). I know you (EG) support their print, if for nothing else their Bush bashing.
 
Validity... Scmhadiddly....

Anyone who can't understand the context of the story needs to spend about, Ohhhhhh, five minutes in FRONT of a live AK-47, TRY to sleep in a mud trench, during a downpoar at 50 degrees, stick THEIR finger into a buddies chest wound to try to stop that god awful sucking sound & bleeding, only to ACTUALLY watch his eyes roll and glaze over, all the time listening to him beg you not to let him die. Then go home and have to face his family and try to explain why YOU let their Husband, Son, Daddy, Brother die...

Then...AND ONLY THEN... will I address your condemnations of our troops efforts, or the hardships of their families!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Address Politics for what it is.... but leave my boys, and their families, out of it............
 
Thank God I've never had to do any of that Gunner! I know plenty of buddies though who have and I know where you are coming from. God bless our troops; their families, and their leaders!
 
if,if,could,could,will
Woulda coulda shoulda...These people in the news paper seem to like to run on a lot of conjecture and second guessing about what their little closed minds seem to come up with... :rolleyes:

Bush’s entire Presidency will come down to this small, dusty town west of Baghdad.
I sure hope these closed minded &^%^% Really believe this silly stuff....They they can absolutly be run thru the mud when their small lives and empty dreams are dashed upon the rocks of the future.... ;)
That was a great post Wally, true or not... :D :D :D
 
G-46 (sounds like I am playing BINGO).

Who were you addressing with "Then...AND ONLY THEN... will I address your condemnations of our troops efforts, or the hardships of their families!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

It was Ms. Kimble who personalized the arguements to use the images of the troops in her piece of fiction. Did somebody else "condem" your troops???

I think her complete fabrication designed to further her own agenda is the item needing condemnation, and it appears that her fabrication was yanked from its' publisher.

It is funny how many supported the fabrication, even after exposed for the fiction that it was...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,469
Messages
2,022,479
Members
36,182
Latest member
Corsen
Back
Top