FI460
Well-known member
This is a fair point. You can also make a compelling argument that state ownership is the sweet spot for public land as well.
But history doesn't support that in the west.
History suggests most western states are more interested in selling off their lands, and historical state management of wildlife has been pretty successful.
There are of ways for states to make money off of public lands.
I can think of a big one right off the top of my head- seeing as this is a hunting forum, I bet you could even guess what it is!
Can't imagine most cattle grazers would rather pay their respective state fee vs the feds AUM...