It’s ironic that you would bring the 10th Amendment up in an opposition position of this, as I would imagine it is a central pillar of the argument to transfer unappropriated lands back to the states.
only in reference to the remarks that public resources should all be federal or all be state, not mixed.
the 10th helps explain, if not being entirely foundational, as to exactly why there is a mixture there in authority and management over different resources. that is not problematic or ironic to me.