BuzzH
Well-known member
Correct.Depends on how you look at it I just applied for Alaska spent a couple hundred bucks on tags in the 1-5% range knowing I’ll probably never see them. But if I didn’t apply i definitely would have never got the opportunity. That state has been good to me and I view the money I give the agency as a donation. If your applying for anything without the idea of it’s a good donation for conservation that maybe some
Day you’ll get something back from your gonna have a bad time
The thing with Zim is that he figures if he's not entitled to a tag, there's no point in putting in.
Not a bad thing necessarily if money is tight and you want a sure deal and maximum return on your application investment.
His trouble is, he can't see the other side like your post illustrates.
When I started applying seriously out of state in the late 90's, I made the decision to put in for everything. Knowing full well I was mostly applying as a donation to the good cause of wildlife. I'm also good enough at statistics to know that if you apply long enough, for enough tags, even those with low odds, you'll draw some.
I've drawn some pretty awesome tags in the random draw on very low odds.