8andcounting
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2013
- Messages
- 3,401
Holy fTo increase Limited Entry rifle bull Permits by 50% and make archery hunting an unlimited permit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Holy fTo increase Limited Entry rifle bull Permits by 50% and make archery hunting an unlimited permit.
What kind of crack cocaine are these folks on? Is the goal NOT to make an impact on "objective numbers"? Both those ideas will have the opposite affect, just as the original bad idea.To increase Limited Entry rifle bull Permits by 50% and make archery hunting an unlimited permit.
What kind of crack cocaine are these folks on? Is the goal NOT to make an impact on "objective numbers"? Both those ideas will have the opposite affect, just as the original bad idea.
Don't bother with cows, let's stay focused on culling the trophy bull elk. Let's make the best elk hunting in MT a commodity and while we're at it, let's make sure none of them are alive on public land, and that the cows continue to be horded on private as bait for a small portion of the bull hunters..
I get it. Thank you for elaborating. Well done.Well, I'm not a member of any political party. They're both not worth joining.
But we we were pushing them on the EMP not being enforced, pushing them to go cow only in over-objective units, asking them to raise objectives, supported increased harvest opportunities, trying to get other programs instituted that would have improved public land habitats, defied them on the PAL Act which they didn't want, but we did & got it done w/ Sen,. Blasdel (R-Big Fork)etc. We were hammering them on shoulder seasons, season setting, etc.
There's a deeper issue here that is just being laid bare by how far the pendulum has swung.
Holy F what?? I’ll wait.Holy f
That is exactly a goal- not to make an impact. You can't sell as many bull elk hunts if you reduce the elk numbers by 1/3rd. While Hank tells hunters to "get to know some private landowners" if they want to hunt, I'm sure he is telling the landowners complaining about elk damage "you better start leasing to outfitters" to compensate for the loss.Is the goal NOT to make an impact on "objective numbers"?
Agreed. He had great hair too.Whoever commented from region 6 really hammered them. Nice work by that gentleman.
Agreed. He had great hair too.
I was just telling @Gerald Martin earlier today.....nice job with the comb, very professional. You guys raise the bar for the rest of us.Agreed. He had great hair too.
I just want them to reverse the 900 tag bundling, full stop. We used to archery hunt a mediocre unit right by a family cabin, that is no longer reasonable draw odds for archery. The unit doesn't have a ton of elk, but it's where my dad got his first shot at a bull with his bow, and the last place I bow hunted with my grandpa. bundling it with the 900 tag made it much more desirable in the draw, even though the unit isn't one anyone would hunt on that 900 tag.Exactly. That hurts residents and helps NRs that use a guide and NR landowners in that district. Same effect, under the guise of "simplification".
He doesnt like the proposal Rod. Do you?Holy F what?? I’ll wait.