tzone
Well-known member
Quite a fascinating topic where both sides of the coin have a valid argument. I know how I would/will handle the situation and it may be 180* different from others.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And everybody else that knows about it too. mtmuleyI know of more than one land-locked section I'll be visiting.
Ill get there earliest.And everybody else that knows about it too. mtmuley
Agreed. Meateater had a podcast on this.So don't "hike" the streambed, bird watch the stream bed. Wildlife photograph the stream bed. Heck, FISH the stream. Certainly that is a water based recreation. Many days hunting I hunt, then switch to fishing, then back to hunting.
Yes it is ... and when the LEO confronts you, explain how brilliant you are in gaming the stream access regs ... as he inquires about that elk quarter protruding from your Audubon backpack and the rifle attached to your creel.So don't "hike" the streambed, bird watch the stream bed. Wildlife photograph the stream bed. Heck, FISH the stream. Certainly that is a water based recreation.
Post #69 has missed the lengthy evolution?!Why muddy that issue in the corner crossing thread?
Legalize corner hopping and the “big bull” you saw would’ve been gone at 2.5 yrs of age, instead of living to 7 or 8. In lieu of attempting to force access, ask forReally interested in this topic. I can see both sides of it. My grandparents own land in Texas n part of it is on the Medina River which people are legally allowed to access within a certain amount of feet from the water, well, we end up having to pick up all the trash n look at all the carcasses from these “people”
On the other hand it is “our” the public tax payers land. My friends son n I found a beautiful chunk of state land in Montana that we could see from another chunk of state land from. Every afternoon a good herd w a giant bull would go from the private land they fed on to this public land, no way to access it without corner hopping, so didn’t get to make a play on him.
Hopefully something gets straightened out on the rules. We read over them intently w no clear explanation found.
Your not wrong. However, the public should have access to public land.Legalize corner hopping and the “big bull” you saw would’ve been gone at 2.5 yrs of age, instead of living to 7 or 8. In lieu of attempting to force access, ask for
Management.
Management would be the best way forward but as much money that is being spent it would be easy to mark the corners. They aren’t always in the most ideal spot so it would lead to trespassing. It’s one step and most people are too lazy to make that step with an easier route. I’m all for it though.Your not wrong. However, the public should have access to public land.
They would also have to be marked because the gps apps would need to within a foot or so. Once kept returning to a waypoint that I had marked with OnX and I’d wind up in a spot 10’ away.Management would be the best way forward but as much money that is being spent it would be easy to mark the corners. They aren’t always in the most ideal spot so it would lead to trespassing. It’s one step and most people are too lazy to make that step with an easier route. I’m all for it though.
Boy making a marking requirement will really make those land surveyors happy. It would give them a lot of work that’s for sure.They would also have to be marked because the gps apps would need to within a foot or so. Once kept returning to a waypoint that I had marked with OnX and I’d wind up in a spot 10’ away.
I think the marking requirement could be included within any law of the relevant agency were to survey it or they allowed a reasonable amount of overlap.
Maybe that's the key here. Get the PLS lobbying group to bring the plight of the surveyors to the legislature - how is a small business supposed to survive when their work is unpredictable? It's almost like a lottery!Boy making a marking requirement will really make those land surveyors happy. It would give them a lot of work that’s for sure.
Some say you can. Some say you can’t.Back to why I bumped this thread, what is the current law in MT on corner crossing? Can we go from public to public at a 4 corner section with private on the other 2 sides??
Might be something they could be interested in. I think this legislation session they had more important stuff to worry about I heard they had to defend who could properly claim a corner. I could only imagine how many irroneous corners would be marked with everyone and their onx capabilities saying they found this corner and that corner because their phone screen said they were supposedly in the “exact” assumed spots.Maybe that's the key here. Get the PLS lobbying group to bring the plight of the surveyors to the legislature - how is a small business supposed to survive when their work is unpredictable? It's almost like a lottery!