Montana Statewide Grizzly Bear Management Plan

[Sytes]

One step forward, no steps back.

Montana unveils its plan for managing grizzly bears

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks has finalized its plan for managing grizzly bears, described by the agency as among Montana’s most “conservation-reliant” and “conflict-prone” species.

dailyinterlake.com

Dreaming of Jeannie to see this through.

 

[Straight Arrow]

The plan is the Touchdown Tommy pass play to Taco Dowler in the griz end zone. We Bobcats are hoping it is viewed and appreciated statewide
Montana Brawl of the Wild coming soon ... stayed tuned.

And yes, Sytes, we see another baby step toward grizzly bear management too.

 

[Nameless Range]

When I read that, I see a fairly mature and well thought out management plan.

I am convinced that the majority of those opposed to state management just don’t like the idea of the possibility of hunting grizzly Bears. The “ scientific” reasons I’ve heard seem based on goalposts that are moving and conjecture about exploding recreation and are not at all explicit.

For people who are opposed to management, I’ve gotten in the habit of asking them what specifically they think will happen if the state takes on management. A reduction in Griz numbers that would put the population in peril is rarely the answer, because I think they know that won’t happen. Even worst case scenario, if they’re right and Montana fails to manage her Grizz properly, they will just be relisted. So where is the big risk?

It’s time to move on in my opinion.

On a sidenote, I’ve been collecting the comments of a lot of the conservation orgs and scientists who were opposed to state management of wolves 15 years ago. Looking through old newspapers. Lots of apocalyptic talk about Wolf population plummeting, and the eradication of wolves from the landscape. Mirrors of comments from today’s opponents of state management of grizzlies. In 2010 Montana had its first wolf hunting season, there were around 600 wolves in Montana. After 15 years of hunting and trapping wolves, we have around 1100.

Few things are as telling about whether someone knows what they’re talking about or not as much as someone’s ability to predict what will happen regarding the topic in question. Credentials and passion do not an accurate prediction make.

 

[Straight Arrow]

I see a fairly mature and well thought out management plan.

Agree.

It’s time to move on in my opinion.

Yep.

... whether someone knows what they’re talking about or not as much as someone’s ability to predict what will happen regarding the topic in question.

So many factors at play that prediction is a guess at best. I prefer to let US Wildlife and FWP continue to collaborate, then turn over management IAW this plan, "see what happens", and allow the state to make appropriate adjustments.

 

[jryoung]

USFWS doesn't de-list, but proposes a rule change. Given the long history of the USFWS delisting and courts relisting is this a strategic move by the USFWS to defend against the serial litigators, lip-service, or an attempt by Biden to kill the Montana way of life (according to GG).

“This reclassification will facilitate recovery of grizzly bears and provide a stronger foundation for eventual delisting,” said Martha Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director. “And the proposed changes to our 4(d) rule will provide management agencies and landowners more tools and flexibility to deal with human/bear conflicts, an essential part of grizzly bear recovery.”

Feds deny Montana petition to delist grizzly bears, propose new rule on populations

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has denied Montana and Wyoming’s petition to delist grizzly bears in the Greater Greater Yellowstone and Northern Continental Divide Ecosystems

www.ktvh.com

 

[Wind Gypsy]

USFWS doesn't de-list, but proposes a rule change. Given the long history of the USFWS delisting and courts relisting is this a strategic move by the USFWS to defend against the serial litigators, lip-service, or an attempt by Biden to kill the Montana way of life (according to GG).

“This reclassification will facilitate recovery of grizzly bears and provide a stronger foundation for eventual delisting,” said Martha Williams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director. “And the proposed changes to our 4(d) rule will provide management agencies and landowners more tools and flexibility to deal with human/bear conflicts, an essential part of grizzly bear recovery.”

Feds deny Montana petition to delist grizzly bears, propose new rule on populations

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has denied Montana and Wyoming’s petition to delist grizzly bears in the Greater Greater Yellowstone and Northern Continental Divide Ecosystems

www.ktvh.com

Oh yeah, waiting until they are "recovered" everywhere in the northwest seems like a real "strong foundation" for never delisting. Thanks Martha.