Andrew Posewitz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2020
- Messages
- 28
Hello All,
As you may recall, the last legislative session in Montana threatened a great number of things that many of us collectively value. From the last-minute insertion of outfitter guaranteed tags with no public comment, which overrode a citizen-passed initiative, to the attempts to give wealthy landowners transferrable tags; management by science was eroded in favor of management by political donor.
Since the last session, it has gotten worse. From failed efforts in front of the FWP Commission during the season setting process to get what they couldn’t get through the legislature, to new lawsuits seeking to make management even more political. The two most absurd efforts came in the form of a bill to limit who private landowners could sell their land to and an effort to eliminate prescriptive easements as a form of access.
We have seen a Montana representative at the federal level co-sponsor a bill to remove Pittman Robertson money (and consequently defund Habitat Montana) and 2 members of the land board reject the entirety of public opinion and hunters in favor of out of state real estate developers:
https://helenair.com/opinion/column...cle_e8108b4d-2da5-54d8-8664-be32d1910cc2.html
In addition to prescriptive easements, we have seen continued efforts by wealthy out of state interests figure out new ways to stop you from accessing public lands. The Hughes creek road was twice declared public and yet landowners gates went unchallenged by local officials while they debated the definition of “immediately” and told the public “..access is at best marginal, but it’s sort of a hill to die on for public land and access folks,” Chilcott said. “I think you can make a case to find a better place to provide real access.”
https://dailymontanan.com/2022/01/08/hughes-creek-road-blocked-again/
All of this is evidence that we have not yet been loud enough as these continued efforts to erode the public trust and undo 100+-years of our accomplishments continue. We have been promised that if we “liked” what happened last session, we are “really going to like” what will be proposed in this session.
The time to become involved is now, not after folks have been elected. To that end, a group began meeting last year to explore avenues to be more involved with policymakers than we have been and begin a dialogue much earlier in the process. As a result, the Montana Public Trust Coalition, a bi-partisan group of people who value Montana’s heritage, was formed and has sent a note to each candidate asking them to promise to protect our heritage.
The first story of our coalition can be found here:
Our story and the promise can be found here:
https://www.montanapublictrustcoalition.com/
On that website, you can see who has endorsed our efforts, including former governors from each party, a number of former Commissioners who served under both parties as well as a substantial number of current living Outdoor Hall of Fame inductees. In addition, we are asking grass roots citizens to sign on as well and provide their own personal testimonials if they wish. Lastly, we are tracking candidate responses to our request. We were honored to do a podcast with Randy which we would expect to drop any day now to further explain what was happening.
Thanks for taking the time to read this and we will leave you with the following asks:
Andrew Posewitz
Proud Member of the Montana Public Trust Coalition
As you may recall, the last legislative session in Montana threatened a great number of things that many of us collectively value. From the last-minute insertion of outfitter guaranteed tags with no public comment, which overrode a citizen-passed initiative, to the attempts to give wealthy landowners transferrable tags; management by science was eroded in favor of management by political donor.
Since the last session, it has gotten worse. From failed efforts in front of the FWP Commission during the season setting process to get what they couldn’t get through the legislature, to new lawsuits seeking to make management even more political. The two most absurd efforts came in the form of a bill to limit who private landowners could sell their land to and an effort to eliminate prescriptive easements as a form of access.
We have seen a Montana representative at the federal level co-sponsor a bill to remove Pittman Robertson money (and consequently defund Habitat Montana) and 2 members of the land board reject the entirety of public opinion and hunters in favor of out of state real estate developers:
https://helenair.com/opinion/column...cle_e8108b4d-2da5-54d8-8664-be32d1910cc2.html
In addition to prescriptive easements, we have seen continued efforts by wealthy out of state interests figure out new ways to stop you from accessing public lands. The Hughes creek road was twice declared public and yet landowners gates went unchallenged by local officials while they debated the definition of “immediately” and told the public “..access is at best marginal, but it’s sort of a hill to die on for public land and access folks,” Chilcott said. “I think you can make a case to find a better place to provide real access.”
https://dailymontanan.com/2022/01/08/hughes-creek-road-blocked-again/
All of this is evidence that we have not yet been loud enough as these continued efforts to erode the public trust and undo 100+-years of our accomplishments continue. We have been promised that if we “liked” what happened last session, we are “really going to like” what will be proposed in this session.
The time to become involved is now, not after folks have been elected. To that end, a group began meeting last year to explore avenues to be more involved with policymakers than we have been and begin a dialogue much earlier in the process. As a result, the Montana Public Trust Coalition, a bi-partisan group of people who value Montana’s heritage, was formed and has sent a note to each candidate asking them to promise to protect our heritage.
The first story of our coalition can be found here:
Montana coalition seeks candidates’ pledge on hunting, conservation
The Montana Public Trust Coalition, a new bipartisan grassroots group, went live with a website aimed at holding state legislators accountable for their votes related to hunting, fishing and conservation during the 2023 session.
missoulacurrent.com
Our story and the promise can be found here:
https://www.montanapublictrustcoalition.com/
On that website, you can see who has endorsed our efforts, including former governors from each party, a number of former Commissioners who served under both parties as well as a substantial number of current living Outdoor Hall of Fame inductees. In addition, we are asking grass roots citizens to sign on as well and provide their own personal testimonials if they wish. Lastly, we are tracking candidate responses to our request. We were honored to do a podcast with Randy which we would expect to drop any day now to further explain what was happening.
Thanks for taking the time to read this and we will leave you with the following asks:
- Please check out the website.
- If, after doing so, you support our efforts we encourage you to sign on and leave a testimonial.
- Please check to see if the candidates in your district have responded in a way that is consistent with your values, if not, please contact them during the election cycle and let them know how you feel.
- Please find a way to discuss these items with them during the campaign, not during the session. It is really hard to get their attention during the session. Remember they have 90-days to take on all the challenges of the state, be fair to them and give them time to hear you and ask questions.
Andrew Posewitz
Proud Member of the Montana Public Trust Coalition