Gerald Martin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,643
That is suprising. Maybe they got enough landowner tags now - they dont need as many people with a gen permit to hire them.
Landowner tags? You want to explain how that works?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is suprising. Maybe they got enough landowner tags now - they dont need as many people with a gen permit to hire them.
I originally heard this comment when the MCS season proposal came out. Turns out it originated as a rumor from some of the hardcore MBA crew that will fight to the death to keep every single day of the current archery season for MT deer and elk.Landowner tags? You want to explain how that works?
Do you just make shit up?That is suprising. Maybe they got enough landowner tags now - they dont need as many people with a gen permit to hire them.
Landowners in SE MT look across the boarder at WY two week season with envy.
Imagine the improvement hunter/landowner relations when your door isn’t being banged on or phone ringing just as you are sitting down for thanksgiving dinner.
Imagine the improvement hunter/landowner relations when your door isn’t being banged on or phone ringing just as you are sitting down for thanksgiving dinner.
Agree! I assisted a friend near Hammond that had his property in BMA last year for the first time and talked to him two nights ago and said he won't likely enroll again. It's too much of a headache to coordinate hunters, and his property is rather small. People get tired of arranging hunters for 12 weeks. They would be better suited and more fair if the BMA was managed through regional offices like some of the parcels in Region 2. Shortening the seasons would be a great benefitImagine the improvement hunter/landowner relations when your door isn’t being banged on or phone ringing just as you are sitting down for thanksgiving dinner.
Agree! I assisted a friend near Hammond that had his property in BMA last year for the first time and talked to him two nights ago and said he won't likely enroll again. It's too much of a headache to coordinate hunters, and his property is rather small. People get tired of arranging hunters for 12 weeks. They would be better suited and more fair if the BMA was managed through regional offices like some of the parcels in Region 2. Shortening the seasons would be a great benefit
That would be super cool but I feel like it would have to be set up so that if the person no called no showed they wouldn’t be able to use the program again for the seasonAs a separate matter from our season structure proposal I would love to see a renovation of the reservation process for Type 2 Block Management properties for the landowners who are tired of dealing with the amount of hunters trying to get a slot to hunt. They have to deal with the folks whom they give permission to as well as everyone else who calls when they’re already booked.
Personally, I have difficulty knowing with enough certainty when I can hunt to schedule time slots before hunting season. By the time I know when I can hunt, I’m reluctant to call to try and find an open slot for when I can hunt. I know that I will have to bother multiple landowners in the evening or early morning before I get an opening. I know that if I were a landowner, I would get sick of the phone constantly ringing even though my openings were filled. Consequently, I generally don’t hunt Type 2 properties.
I would love to see a voluntary registry of properties that could be booked via a website much like a VRBO or AirBNB site where hunters could browse multiple properties online and compare open dates on the properties to the dates they want to hunt. They would then be able to enter their information and reserve a date.
And stop some of these Type 2 BMA's from receiving $$$ and only letting their buddies and family hunt. That's fine, but they shouldn't be getting hunter funds if that is the way they want to operate.As a separate matter from our season structure proposal I would love to see a renovation of the reservation process for Type 2 Block Management properties for the landowners who are tired of dealing with the amount of hunters trying to get a slot to hunt. They have to deal with the folks whom they give permission to as well as everyone else who calls when they’re already booked.
Personally, I have difficulty knowing with enough certainty when I can hunt to schedule time slots before hunting season. By the time I know when I can hunt, I’m reluctant to call to try and find an open slot for when I can hunt. I know that I will have to bother multiple landowners in the evening or early morning before I get an opening. I know that if I were a landowner, I would get sick of the phone constantly ringing even though my openings were filled. Consequently, I generally don’t hunt Type 2 properties.
I would love to see a voluntary registry of properties that could be booked via a website much like a VRBO or AirBNB site where hunters could browse multiple properties online and compare open dates on the properties to the dates they want to hunt. They would then be able to enter their information and reserve a date.
Need looked into
They just don't answer the phone, and I am pretty sure they use the number for the old land line and just unplug it. Some of those type 2s shouldn't even be in the program. I have tried one on Aug 15 that said they are booked and I should try to call in November for the following year. Demand is clearly too high.Personally, I have difficulty knowing with enough certainty when I can hunt to schedule time slots before hunting season. By the time I know when I can hunt, I’m reluctant to call to try and find an open slot for when I can hunt. I know that I will have to bother multiple landowners in the evening or early morning before I get an opening. I know that if I were a landowner, I would get sick of the phone constantly ringing even though my openings were filled. Consequently, I generally don’t hunt Type 2 properties.
The nature of western hunting in roaded areas seems unconducive to a "no show" policy. Someone could easily intend to hunt a property and book it but then adjust accordingly to what they see when they show up to area in person. If you're pronghorn hunting and can glass most of a BMA property from the road or adjacent BLM land, see nothing worthwhile and move on, were you a "no show" in violation of the rules? Or perhaps you sign up for multiple type II BMAs with the plan to check them all out in a single day but end up killing something at the first property or on public between properties and lack the cell service to cancel your other reservations before the end of the day. It seems like the only way a no show policy could work would be if you only signed up immediately before stepping foot on a property, but that would also rely on good cell service.That would be super cool but I feel like it would have to be set up so that if the person no called no showed they wouldn’t be able to use the program again for the season
Thanks, Eric.Need looked into
2025 works for me, thanks.I think they may be necessary at some point.
Thanks, Gerald.Speaking personally, I think they may be necessary at some point. How to determine the appropriate amount of hunters per region is something we discussed at length among our group and came to the conclusion that it would just be a WAG if we tried to give a number without better information. We concluded that we don’t have the answers to several questions.
1. What is the appropriate amount of hunter?
2. How would FWP implement a regional cap that would either not make unacceptable (socially) restrictions on hunter opportunities and be effective (biologically) to benefit the resource?
The necessity or lack there of regional caps is a legitimate conversation that will continue to occur and should continue to occur. As a group we have decided not to call for or support regional caps in this proposal, not because we necessarily support or oppose them. We just believe that with several years mandatory reporting in place to give us a better understanding of hunter distribution and regional biologists monitoring of the resource the conclusion for need of regional caps or conclusion they are not needed will be more accurate in the future than it would be today.
2025 works for me, thanks.