Hunt Talk Radio - Look for it on your favorite Podcast platform

Montana 2025 Legislative Session

Don’t state and federal gas taxes compensate for this?
Montana's gas tax revenue has barely increased in the last 20 years, but the price of building roads sure as hell has. The legislature has been super opposed to increasing the gas tax, probably at the behest of shipping and tourism (but also their constituents - gas prices increasing is a pretty universal way of pissing folks off), but increased fuel efficiency and now electric cars means less money coming in to somehow fix all the failing infrastructure at once.
 
Montana's gas tax revenue has barely increased in the last 20 years, but the price of building roads sure as hell has. The legislature has been super opposed to increasing the gas tax, probably at the behest of shipping and tourism (but also their constituents - gas prices increasing is a pretty universal way of pissing folks off), but increased fuel efficiency and now electric cars means less money coming in to somehow fix all the failing infrastructure at once.
There was an agreement on funds to fix those roads last session. The governor shoved it in a drawer until the session officially ended before saying he vetoing it.
Of note, in WA I pay a higher annual registration for the wife’s hybrid than I do for my truck. And that’s with much higher gas taxes. So it is a fixable problem.
 
A couple of sessions ago Missoula tried to institute a small gas local tax to go to road maintenance locally. The Legislature put the hammer down saying municipalities shall not dare do something to help themselves.
 
A couple of sessions ago Missoula tried to institute a small gas local tax to go to road maintenance locally. The Legislature put the hammer down saying municipalities shall not dare do something to help themselves.
There had been a legal county option on the books for ages. Missoula took the $0.02 increase it to voters who approved using the revenue to fund local infrastructure maintenance.

This seems to me like a serious case of legislative overreach, punishing a locality for having politics that differ from their own.

Sorry to keep taking this thread off track taking taxes, but that was some serious BS.

Matt Reiger was quoted as saying “The gas tax might be no big deal for $100,000 a year earners, but for the low-income people it is a big deal.” Hopefully he maintains that way of thinking if the legislature debates a sales tax.
 
There had been a legal county option on the books for ages. Missoula took the $0.02 increase it to voters who approved using the revenue to fund local infrastructure maintenance.

This seems to me like a serious case of legislative overreach, punishing a locality for having politics that differ from their own.

Sorry to keep taking this thread off track taking taxes, but that was some serious BS.

Matt Reiger was quoted as saying “The gas tax might be no big deal for $100,000 a year earners, but for the low-income people it is a big deal.” Hopefully he maintains that way of thinking if the legislature debates a sales tax.
We voted a few years back to make itnso that local communities couldn't make their own laws that restrict something more than state law didn't we? Is this part of it? So Missoula don't ban conceal carry like they tried to. Or Helena can't have its own vapor ban.
 
We voted a few years back to make itnso that local communities couldn't make their own laws that restrict something more than state law didn't we? Is this part of it? So Missoula don't ban conceal carry like they tried to. Or Helena can't have its own vapor ban.
That wasn’t part of it. A gas tax isn’t a restriction. The 1979 legislature passed a law allowing counties to impart a gas tax to fund local transportation maintenance. Missoula County voters said “sure.” The legislature said “nope, not for you guys.”
 
That wasn’t part of it. A gas tax isn’t a restriction. The 1979 legislature passed a law allowing counties to impart a gas tax to fund local transportation maintenance. Missoula County voters said “sure.” The legislature said “nope, not for you guys.”
The most "big brother" of them are usually the ones that say they are doing it for Freedom and Liberty.
 
Legislative Services is required to open access to bill junque files* after last week’s court ruling, right? How does Joe Public request said access? I’d be curious to see the sausage ingredients on some of these bills.

*For those unfamiliar, junque files are described as “[A] collection of information that includes key documents such as bill drafts, communications between legislators and lobbyists, and other analyses that shed further light on legislation.”
 
Some more bills.

HB 353: Revise shed hunting requirements
(Require shed hunting license)

HB 283: Revise laws for hunting licenses lotteries

• Allows sheep and moose tags for a lottery
(Like BHA did with the mule deer raffle)

HB 328: Allow hunters over 75 years to use general elk license for cow elk

• 75 years of age or older may use a general elk license to harvest an antlerless elk during any season in a hunting district in which a youth under 15 years of age may harvest an antlerless elk and on privately owned land.


HB 330: Create auction or lottery licenses for antelope and swans


HB 356: Allow livestock loss reimbursement for black bear predation
 
Caribou Gear

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,576
Messages
2,063,202
Members
36,656
Latest member
elkseeker68
Back
Top