WanderWoman
Well-known member
The beauty about CEs is that they occur between two willing parties. A willing buyer, and a willing seller. No one is coming and forcing a perpetual CE on someone that doesn't want one. Do you think that because you don't like perpetual CEs, you should be able to inhibit someone else from selling one? Because even if you yourself aren't doing that, others with that same "I don't like perpetual" mentality, and the power to do so, are preventing just that. I'm not a landowner but if I was and someone was exerting their values onto me in such a manner, I'd feel pretty violated. It'd be like someone saying, "Oh WanderWoman, you can't sell your house to so-and-so, I don't like them." Both are attempts to prevent someone from doing something, based on a personal opinion or value as opposed to what I feel would be a legitimate reason.I don’t want to see my 4th on one side(5th on the other side) ranch/farm, or yours developed either…. I nor my brother, son/nephews have much to worry about here.
I view an easement that’s “in perpetuity” as selling the soul of the land. It puts a price on something that is priceless to me.
As far as soul of the land goes, I think that's dead and gone when someone paves it over for a condo or McMansion. Especially when said McMansion is built up on a road called "Sage Hen Lane," or "Mule Deer Way," as some tribute to the critters that may have once been there, but aren't anymore.
I do agree, the native ground we have in Montana and in the west is priceless, especially when it comes to the value it has for future generations.