Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Outside of the economics of selling/transfer, a tag that is oversubscribed (everyone that wants one gets one with plenty left over) functions very similarly. So I don’t think transferable is that tangible of a benefit there.They aren’t going to do any good if they are not transferable. Most landowners aren’t going to stack cow elk up on their own land with no upside.
“Too many elk” is just a pretend thing most landowners say to get more tags and/or money. That is not specific to Montana.
This is the elephant in the room and I certainly will play a role in how big game is managed, especially Mule Deer. I’d like to see more money spent on CWD research and I don’t believe it should come out of wildlife funding. God help us if/when it spreads to humans……There are areas where CWD likely hasn’t made it yet, areas where CWD exists but hasn’t been detected, and then a whole spectrum of areas where CWD exists and has various prevalences. If it’s not somewhere yet it’s likely on the way. Given the fact that a prion isn’t a living thing, the length of time between transmission, when a deer can transmit, when symptoms start to show, and death, it really is a nearly perfect disease. I find that rather terrifying. Not to derail this into another CWD thread but it’s a real issue complicating deer management and a really good reason deer management shouldn’t be set in statute.
Selling/transfer landowner tags is closing a door and opening a window for some on this subject. It isn’t needed the tags can be surplus and the rancher can charge a tress pass fee like we currently have. I think landowners selling tags even for cows would cause riotsOutside of the economics of selling/transfer, a tag that is oversubscribed (everyone that wants one gets one with plenty left over) functions very similarly. So I don’t think transferable is that tangible of a benefit there.
This is the elephant in the room and I certainly will play a role in how big game is managed, especially Mule Deer. I’d like to see more money spent on CWD research and I don’t believe it should come out of wildlife funding. God help us if/when it spreads to humans……
It isn’t needed the tags can be surplus and the rancher can charge a tress pass fee like we currently have.
Look at what they'll pay to come shoot a forky or cow. And more keep coming.The amount of people who will pay $500+ to shoot a cow is beyond me. I guess if the killing is good..
Think this is what @Shed God was trying to say about CWD. As long as there is a big concentration of them theres some risk. Theres some areas where the deer are VERY thick on private and near extinct on public.FWP has no control over how private landowners manage. CWD management is Montana’s current season structure, you can piss pound the public to nothing but private landowners aren’t going to do that. They have deer and quality bucks, it’s a tough sell to ask them to make their private look like the neighbors blm.
That’s kind of what I was trying to get at. Trespass fees + unlimited/surplus tags perform a very similar function with little management effectiveness. I’m in no way advocating for transferable tags.Selling/transfer landowner tags is closing a door and opening a window for some on this subject. It isn’t needed the tags can be surplus and the rancher can charge a tress pass fee like we currently have. I think landowners selling tags even for cows would cause riots