Kenetrek Boots

MN/WI/MI Wolves Delisted

MNHunter

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
1,711
Location
Hastings, MN
Wolves on verge of losing place on U.S. protection list
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is expected to announce at around 12:30 p.m. today that that the gray wolves in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan have been removed from the federal endangered species list.

By Bob Von Sternberg, Star Tribune


After 33 years of federal protection, the gray wolves in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan appear poised to be removed from the federal endangered species list, a milestone in the animals' dramatic recovery across the Upper Midwest.
An Interior Department official has scheduled a news conference Monday to announce the status of the gray wolf in this region and in the northern Rocky Mountains.

Officials of the department and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which administers the Endangered Species Act, refused on Friday to say what that announcement would be.

However, federal officials have been moving toward what is called "de-listing" gray wolves since early in this decade, when they first proposed doing so.

Wolves for decades had been listed as "threatened" in Minnesota and as "endangered" in all other states except Alaska. In 2003, the Fish and Wildlife Service reclassified all wolves in the eastern half of the United States as "threatened" because their populations had recovered sufficiently in the western Great Lakes area.

In 2004, the Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to remove gray wolves in the eastern United States from the threatened list, allowing states and tribes with wolf populations on their lands to manage the wolves. A federal judge, in effect, threw out that plan, shrinking the proposed de-listing states to the three in the Upper Midwest.

Last March, then-Interior Secretary Gale Norton took the penultimate step, declaring that the three-state region's wolves had sufficiently recovered from the threat of extinction to be removed from the list.

Wolf-recovery efforts "ensure the wolf is an enduring part of the landscape of the Upper Midwest," she said at the time.

Land of 3,000 wolves

For centuries, wolves in most of the lower 48 states were ferociously hunted and trapped even as their natural habitat shrank, plunging them toward extinction.

Roughly 4,000 of the animals live in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan's Upper Peninsula. By far the largest concentration is in Minnesota, where about 3,020 live in about 485 packs averaging between five and six wolves each. Their range is in central and northeastern Minnesota.

After Norton's announcement, the department had a year to make the decision final, with public comments made during the interim.

Ron Refsnider, the Fish and Wildlife Service's regional endangered-species listing coordinator, characterized the comments as "a real mix of opinion on de-listing the wolf or not."

In the wake of shrinking the size of the de-listed area, "we got more support for de-listing, including from a couple of environmental groups that had sued us last time around."

The federal government will monitor wolf numbers for five years after the de-listing, which would take effect 30 days after the final rule is published in the Federal Register. If, during that five-year period, the threat to wolves increases, the service would consider re-listing the species.

The Legislature in 2001 anticipated that control of Minnesota's wolves would someday return to the state and enacted a wolf-management plan that protects wolves while attempting to minimize possible harm to livestock.

The law stipulates that hunting and trapping wolves can't be a management option for at least five years after de-listing.

hump hump hump hump hump hump
 
About time.

I grew up in Big Falls - middle of Koochiching County. When I left in 1984, would have called it the middle of the Minnesota wolf universe. I hear that they have expanded quite a bit since then.

During my time there, we would catch lots of wolves in our coyote traps. Sometimes they would tear apart the trap and lots of times they would still be there waiting for us. The USFWS would come and weigh them, take blood samples, etc. and then release them.

I am hoping I can get a tag for a wolf in MT, as I will be setting out a lot of traps in an effort to catch one.

They are actually very easy to catch, if you have much trapping experience. The bad part is that if a pack comes through an area where you have five traps set, you will have two or three wolves in the traps, and all the other traps will be messed with.

I know a lot of guys back in Big Falls who will quickly get the numbers back in balance, if they can get tags to do so.

I am glad they are delisting the midwest and Rocky Mountain populations at the same time. It will be harder for the fantatics to fight the legal battle on two fronts.

Happy Hunting (or trapping)!
 
Let's hear from all the Hunt Talkers who said it would never happen.:D

Delisting the Great Lakes region Wolves and proposing a two state delisting process in the Rocky Mountain region is two different ball games.

The USFWS has already stated that they are trying to get Wyoming's plan approved before they actually try to propose delisting this segment.

I'm pretty sure that if this is a two state delisting with the USFWS maintaining control in Wyoming Delisting will not hold up in court.

I hope I'm wrong because I'm ready to start hunting them here in idaho.
 
Advertisement

Forum statistics

Threads
113,590
Messages
2,026,211
Members
36,240
Latest member
Mscarl (she/they)
Back
Top