rtraverdavis
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2016
- Messages
- 4,078
This is an interesting idea, which I believe @BrentD has proposed in the past as a means to address point creep. I wonder what it might actually accomplish, and how such a system might be implemented--let alone be agreed upon by hunters.Only hunt one state per year, R or NR.
It would certainly make it more difficult for "content creators" to be constantly producing more material. But would this really help with crowding and access issues? Maybe. There'd be fewer people running all over the place. I know we like to throw around the fact that what we really should be focusing on is increasing access and increasing wildlife populations--but this is a slow, uphill battle that all the other forces at work in the world seem to grinding against. Not that those efforts shouldn't be paramount and continually pressed, but maybe some self-restraint is necessary as well.
Between the surge in population and development in the West, shrinking game populations, and legislation that is adversarial toward hunting or wildlife, it's hard not to feel like the well is getting near drying up. I wonder if some mandatory restraint might not actually help. You get one big out-of-state hunt per year, but the odds are, it's going to be great.
I'm sure there are a number of reasons why this is a dumb idea, but there are tons of examples from our history that show how some self-inflicted restraint has benefitted hunting and game populations.