T
tjones
Guest
Here some businesses charge the 3% for cc but the no charge for debit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t know the fee off the top of my head for debit. It’s less but not enough to matter. I prefer cash or check. But I run a business with high sales and low transactions. It might be different for a dollar storeSerious question...
Do you get fees for debit transactions as well as credit transactions?
Asking because (as I mentioned earlier), our county charges per transaction regardless of type of card.
I imagine the code would be the same regardless of debit or credit transactions.
Bullshot, I'm sorry to hear of your experience, but I agree that the UPS and FedEx changes are going to impact all of us. Less so for the highest volume gun/ammo shippers. I find it interesting (telling might be a better word?) that the politicos haven't made comment yet.Guys and gals this news is worse than the credit card code. Take a few minutes and look into the new UPS and FedEx policies. We are well on our way to being shut down. Post office will be next. I was going to ship a gun tomorrow to an FFL like I have many times before and now I can’t use UPS or FedEx. I am going to have to drive 3-4 hours to do it personally. This is bad. BAD!
Bullshot, I'm sorry to hear of your experience, but I agree that the UPS and FedEx changes are going to impact all of us. Less so for the highest volume gun/ammo shippers. I find it interesting (telling might be a better word?) that the politicos haven't made comment yet.
It might be an interesting exercise to visit a smaller FFL to inquire about how they have been impacted. Can they still make/receive smaller (single gun sales) shipments? Does it impact fees for the parties to the transaction?
Obviously, cash doesn't work for online sellers. The real point of these efforts is control and your liberties and freedoms. One cut at a time.Ugh…credit cards suck a little bit of life out of you every time you swipe that damn thing! Just use cash and the government will only have the usual ways of tracking your firearm purchases.
We agree with each other that this cc tracking is un-American and violates the Constitutionally-provided liberties that we enjoy in this country. Hard line with Josh Hawley. That man is a seditionist turd who does not care about this country.Commentary for UPS changes...
UPS Threatens to Cancel Service for Most of the Gun Industry
UPS has stepped up its anti-gun campaign by requiring online sellers to ship an average of 50 handguns daily to use its 2nd Day Air service.www.ammoland.com
Senator Hawley addresses Visa, Mastercard and American Express in letter...
Hawley blasts credit card companies over gun sale tracking
bearingarms.com
Online purchases.How does this make it harder?
The credit card transaction tracking (and the new restrictive shipping requirement) changes were the focus of my comments and this thread. They infringe upon our liberties and freedoms.We agree with each other that this cc tracking is un-American and violates the Constitutionally-provided liberties that we enjoy in this country.
“We” don’t agree that having credit card codes set by private banks or private shippers refuse certain types of cargo are a violation of Constitutionally-provided liberties, since VISA, MasterCard, UPS and FedEx are not governmental entities, and the constitution only constrains governmental action. These 4 companies have the right to use their property and their right to contract however they wish. If you want to invest in a new credit card biz or shipping business with different rules you are free to do so.We agree with each other that this cc tracking is un-American and violates the Constitutionally-provided liberties that we enjoy in this country. Hard line with Josh Hawley. That man is a seditionist turd who does not care about this country.
Is it constitutional for congress to pressure private companies to restrict certain constitutional rights?“We” don’t agree that having credit card codes set by private banks or private shippers refuse certain types of cargo are a violation of Constitutionally-provided liberties, since VISA, MasterCard, UPS and FedEx are not governmental entities, and the constitution only constrains governmental action. These 4 companies have the right to use their property and their right to contract however they wish. If you want to invest in a new credit card biz or shipping business with different rules you are free to do so.
I do not like these rules, but they are undoubtedly constitutional under any reading.
On the other hand, having the FBI track purchases without a specific warrant likely would raise some interesting 4thA questions, but the Patriot Act showed a pretty strong willingness to look the other way on that issue.
You can take it in the rump, or fight back.Is it constitutional for congress to pressure private companies to restrict certain constitutional rights?
“Congress” passes laws. Those are bounded by the constitution. Congress members as politicians bluster and blunder - no constitutional rules there.Is it constitutional for congress to pressure private companies to restrict certain constitutional rights?
when corporations track, limit or prohibit something related to 2A, we say its their right as a private company? but if private companies were to restrict, oh say, what kinds of cakes they make? or what kind of medicines they carry, ship, or pay for, all of a sudden that is an infringement of rights.@VikingsGuy, touché. Private corporations may do as they wish. Maybe they will sell the collected info to retailers for targeted advertising as that market is hot right now. Yes, my point was unreasonable searches, 4th Amendment and perhaps we’ll revisit the broadly interpreted Patriot Act to narrow that down.
Talked to one today. Some really bad stories.It might be an interesting exercise to visit a smaller FFL to inquire about how they have been impacted. Can they still make/receive smaller (single gun sales) shipments? Does it impact fees for the parties to the transaction?
It is frustrating but not inconsistent. Failure to bake a cake, by way of example, would not be a violation of the constitutional rights of the cake buyer, but rather a violation of federal or state "public accommodations" statutes. In the present case, the GOP in congress is trying to pass a law that makes it illegal to discriminate against firearms transactions by banks, cc, and shippers. If they pass it (not going to happen unless they get 60 in the senate and a president who would sign) it would not be the 2A at issue, but that statute.when corporations track, limit or prohibit something related to 2A, we say its their right as a private company? but if private companies were to restrict, oh say, what kinds of cakes they make? or what kind of medicines they carry, ship, or pay for, all of a sudden that is an infringement of rights.
A little consistency please?
(Not targeted at you ben, just saying acceptable restrictions from private companies always “seem” to be leaning to one side. )