Advertisement

Lions may be eating more than previously believed

muleguy

New member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
177
Location
Darby,MT
Ferocious appetites: Study finds mountain lions may be eating more than previously believed

Mountain lions were treed in the winter to capture them for collaring

Aliah Knopff

Mountain lions were treed in the winter to capture them for collaring in the Canadian study. The study found that adult male lions were more likely to kill less but bigger prey than females.
2010-12-09T00:30:00Z 2010-12-09T13:31:58Z Ferocious appetites: Study finds mountain lions may be eating more than previously believed

Mountain lions, the largest members of the cat family in North America, may be heartier eaters than some researchers originally estimated.
“One of the most interesting things we found was how much more prey they kill in summer,” said Kyle Knopff, lead author of a three-year Canadian mountain lion study that was recently published in the Journal of Wildlife Management. “Just how focused they become on young of the year ungulates was surprising.”
GPS aids study
Knopff is basing his conclusions on data collected from more than 1,500 kill sites while tracking 54 cougars with GPS collars. The collars allowed the University of Alberta researchers, including his wife Aliah, to move in quickly after a kill to identify what was taken and by which lion.
In the journal article Knopff writes that some previous studies “may have failed to identify higher kill rates for large carnivores in summer because methods in those studies did not permit researchers to locate many neonates or because sample size was too small.”
The use of GPS collars enabled Knopff and his colleagues to collect more data. As a result, he found that mountain lions killed more deer, elk and moose during the summer by focusing on juveniles and actually killed fewer animals in winter. The information contradicts previous studies conducted in Idaho.
“The Idaho estimates differed from our summer estimates by as much as 365 percent in terms of frequency of killing and 538 percent in terms of prey biomass,” Knopff wrote. “Because kill rate fundamentally influences the effect predators have on their prey, the discrepancy between studies represents a substantial difference in the capacity for cougars to impact ungulates.”
Built to kill
The study was conducted over 10 years in west-central Alberta, including the Bow Valley, Jasper National Park, portions of Banff National Park and in Clearwater County east of Banff. The terrain of the study area was a mixture of lodgepole pine and spruce forests at elevations ranging from 2,500 to 9,300 feet. The mountain lions' prey included deer, elk, bighorn sheep, coyotes, feral horses, beaver and porcupines.
Cougars aren't easy creatures to study. The secretive animals range widely to hunt - 250 to 600 square miles for males, 60 to 125 square miles for females.
Adult male cougars can weigh 140 to 165 pounds. One male cougar in Knopff's study tipped the scales at 180 pounds and primarily fed on moose and feral horses. Females typically weigh around 100 pounds. From nose to tail the big cats can measure 6.5 to 10 feet long. The average lifespan for a male is 8 to 10 years, 12 to 14 for females.
Great leapers and sprinters, cougars kill by latching onto their prey with their front claws and powerful forelegs and then biting the windpipe or spine along the neck with their large canine teeth. For smaller prey, lions may crush the animal's skull. On rare occasions lions have been known to attack humans.
“Our kill rate estimates indicate that adult cougars are highly effective predators, killing at rates at the upper end of those recorded for wolves in both frequency and biomass,” Knopff wrote.
In one prey encounter they studied, Knopff said a cougar brought down a feral horse less than 30 yards from where it attacked.
“I think our study showed they are very efficient predators,” he said.
Because of their adaptability, cougars are found from the Yukon to the Andes of South America, a larger range than any other big mammal in the Americas.
Study findings
In studying cougar kill sites, the researchers publicized a couple of interesting details. One is that that female mountain lions with kittens kill more deer; the other is that adult male lions kill larger but fewer animals.
“We had one male cougar kill 18 moose in less than a year,” Knopff said.
Based on the Canadian data, the cougars killed on average .8 ungulates (mainly whitetail deer and moose) a week, an average of about 18 pounds a day. That statistic varied widely, though, based on the individual - from a low of .24 ungulates to a high of 1.38, or 18 to 41 pounds a day.
Those ungulates targeted tended to be young of the year or adults with yearlings, largely because they were easier to subdue.
Deer made up more than 75 percent of the diet for adult female lions in winter and summer. Adult males had a more varied diet, concentrating on moose (36 percent) in the summer and deer (44 percent) in the winter. All told, adult males targeted large ungulates for 62 percent of their diet. Subadult lions also ate more deer than other species, but like human teenagers they also varied their diet more opportunistically than adults.
On average, adult males killed an estimated 10,300 pounds of biomass annually compared to 9,400 pounds killed by females with young kittens.
Humans vs. cougars
Aliah Knopff said her portion of the study focused more on cougar-human interactions and the lion's habitat selection.
She said that as people have continued to build in more remote areas, cougars have had to adapt.
“These are actually quite adaptable carnivores,” she said, from changing their movements to become more nocturnal and avoid humans, to finding undisturbed islands within development to live in - such as along pipelines or well sites. The same can't be said for many other carnivores.
These more urban lions are mainly limited by human tolerance, she said. The people in rural Alberta who were interviewed for the study valued cougars highly, but not if they were killing pets or livestock.
“That's the challenge for cougar conservation when the backyard is becoming more overlapping,” she said.
Possible uses
Lion hunting is allowed in many Western states, including Montana and Wyoming. Hunters track and tree the big cats with hounds. Cougar kills are carefully regulated by state wildlife agencies.
Knopff writes that the Canadian study could be used by game managers to better calculate mountain lions' take of game animals and in turn reduce lion numbers to benefit deer, elk and moose populations. For example, hunting female cougars could reduce the number of deer taken in a specific area.
But such management can also produce unpredictable outcomes, he added. A lion population that is younger may lead to increased confrontations with humans.
Contact Brett French, Gazette Outdoors editor, at [email protected] or at 657-1387.

Study is a few years old but lions still the same=
Read more: http://billingsgazette.com/lifestyl...c47-539f-a267-972e72e570b6.html#ixzz2WhpvCDLx
 
combine the high density of mountain lions with other predators, all at high populations and it is a wonder why ungulates in certain areas are in decline.

While I believe there is some validaty in multi-predator addative effects on localized ungulate popultaions, the overall science continues to advocate cougar predation as compensatory when speaking to mule deer as a whole population, though my own personal conclusions are still being drawn. The science is still young when referencing cougars, though it is making more progress now than in the past twenty years.

Multi-predator studies are in their infancy, and much remains to be learned. Predators kill large numbers of ungulates, no doubt, especially mule deer; but at this point, when talking about mule deer herd declines and/or stagnation in populations, I believe predators, like vehicle kills, loss of habitat, urbanization of winter/summer range, migratory pathways being lost, etc., are only symptoms of a deeper root cause.

So much time, effort and money is being spent on projects that yield little if any results-including predators-that deeper more significant scientific inquiries are being side stepped. I hope a bit more 'out of the box' thinking in our wildlife management arenas will take hold, and lead to some significant advances on mule deer population dynamics/management. One can only hope I suppose...
 
You must be kidding...Did you notice this part of the conclusions=

"On average, adult males killed an estimated 10,300 pounds of biomass annually compared to 9,400 pounds killed by females with young kittens."
 
Last edited:
I take it you are referring to my post. If so, you must have missed my statement: "Predators kill large numbers of ungulates, no doubt, especially mule deer", so yeah, I noticed your bold quote in the article. That 10,300 pounds of biomass annually for male cats works out to be around one 200 pound deer a week. Since the article points to females with young kittens killing smaller deer to achieve the needed biomass, they kill more than the males. And not sure what you are referring to me "kidding" about...
 
Predation is one hurdle mule deer face in order to achieve population levels desired. StillHunterMan, you are correct in all of the issues that are in front of the mule deer. There is no one " fix it" issue and there is no one thing to point our fingers at. All or a combination of these "symptoms" combined hinder the population. One thing that has been identified is that when fire repression started in the late 60's and 70's, that is when the mule deer population started to head down. Than you add in the other issues and it is a domino effect. The other issue, which we have no control over is, weather. What we can try to control and help the deer is habitat, harvest and predator control. There has to be a balance between predators and prey. We can control the number of tags available as well as the quantity of bucks and does to be harvested. but in a lot of cases due to public and/or political pressure the methods of management can be limited. Many areas are in a sad state and just like D.C., nothing moves or minor reactionary methods are used.
 
You must be kidding...Did you notice this part of the conclusions=

"On average, adult males killed an estimated 10,300 pounds of biomass annually compared to 9,400 pounds killed by females with young kittens."

How much of that biomass is rabbits, etc and not ungulates?

Still waiting for the actual science that shows where predators are limiting factors in ungulate populations. Everything I'm seeing points to habitat.
 
How much of that biomass is rabbits, etc and not ungulates?

Still waiting for the actual science that shows where predators are limiting factors in ungulate populations. Everything I'm seeing points to habitat.

I'm seeing a bunch of science that points in a bunch of directions. Habitat is one of those. Climate change, and predation another. Over harvest and politics is another.
 
That's a lot of wabbits

If a watershed has 200 lions X 10,000# = A big pile of rabbits!
 
If a watershed has 200 lions X 10,000# = A big pile of rabbits!

So how do we feed those lions horse meat? I mean we have a problem with non native horses running amok on public lands, then predators eating to many deer and elk, so we feed them horses. Just how do we get the two together?
 
Predation is one hurdle mule deer face in order to achieve population levels desired. StillHunterMan, you are correct in all of the issues that are in front of the mule deer. There is no one " fix it" issue and there is no one thing to point our fingers at. All or a combination of these "symptoms" combined hinder the population. One thing that has been identified is that when fire repression started in the late 60's and 70's, that is when the mule deer population started to head down. Than you add in the other issues and it is a domino effect. The other issue, which we have no control over is, weather. What we can try to control and help the deer is habitat, harvest and predator control. There has to be a balance between predators and prey. We can control the number of tags available as well as the quantity of bucks and does to be harvested. but in a lot of cases due to public and/or political pressure the methods of management can be limited. Many areas are in a sad state and just like D.C., nothing moves or minor reactionary methods are used.

MDF,

I understand what you are saying, and I understand why for most of it. Much of it is the same old mantra hunters have been told for a very, very long time. There are many correlations one can draw when the mule deer herds started their decline, but correlation doesn't neccessitate causation. The predator issue is extreemly volitile and emotional, and the science behind predator/prey relationships is often overlooked or denied. The predator hurdle you speak of is no hurdle at all when you are dealing with a healthy, robust deer population. Pure fawn saturation/recruitment takes care of that very handily, the way nature inteded it to. On the other hand, when you have a healthy deer population facing other factors in addition to predators, then yes, heavy predation can probably stagnate localized herd growth, as the science tells us. It also tells us predation on struggling herds is for the greater part, compensatory. Predators make for an easy 'blame' or scapegoat.

It's also easy to say there isn't a single issue that can't be addressed when conservation organizations and state game departments are focused on issues that have been done over and over, year after year, decade after decade, with no results. Cut tags! Been there done that, all across the west, many times, over and over: results=0 Build fences/overpasses/underpasses! Doing it: results=0 Kill predators! Been there done that, study after study: results=0... And on and on.

Of course weather is huge issue with ungulate population dynamics, always will be: But a healthy herd will rebound after severe weather knocks them down, an unhealthy one won't. It's a frustrating issue to say the least, and hunters are grasping onto anything that sounds believable or 'sensible' that they are being told or hand fed.

What will the near future bring? Unless some new thinking hits those in charge of our wildlife upside the head, the future will bring more of the same: 0... I love your D.C. referrence, point right on!:hump:
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,414
Messages
2,020,357
Members
36,163
Latest member
diverdan169
Back
Top