Mako
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
- Messages
- 216
About to pull the trigger on some Leupold Bx4's. Just debating on 10x42 or 10x50's. Any thoughs?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you and me both.I am driving myself absolutely nuts. Now looking at Bx5's and Zeiss conquests. I can't decide dammit!
you and me both.
However, they are heavier with a smaller field of view than either the zeiss and especially the luepolds.Want me to throw you another loop? I've been talking with Schmalts. I bought a Leupold scope from him a month or so ago and was asking him about bino's back then. He was telling me then that Meopta Meostars blow away their competition, especially for the price, and he's telling me so again. Now I'm considering those. From my research, looks like Zeiss, Swaro, and possibly even Khales all source glass from them, so that says a lot.
I am driving myself absolutely nuts.
Are you making yourself "leupy"?
actually that is not correct surprisingly, the 10x50 have a smaller fov than the 10x42. Turns out this is common for quite a few manufactures. Doesn't make much sense, but I talked with leupold about it and they claim there's no easy way around it. "there's an element of the larger objective lenses that actually affects the fov."I like the smaller ones for portability and fatigue, but if that’s not an issue then the 50mm will have a wider FOV. Depends on your use
I have seen 8x32 bins that have bigger FOV than 8x42 as well. Optics design is not as straightforward as you think.actually that is not correct surprisingly, the 10x50 have a smaller fov than the 10x42. Turns out this is common for quite a few manufactures. Doesn't make much sense, but I talked with leupold about it and they claim there's no easy way around it. "there's an element of the larger objective lenses that actually affects the fov."
Just got a pair of the 10x50 for my old man, the glass is pretty darn good for the money. If it wasn't for the narrow fov I would really like them. I know there are others with even worse fov, but even these are noticeable vs my zeiss conquests.
My 8x32 Conquest HD's have a wider FOV than the 8x42's, which is one reason they are my primary birding and hunting bin.I have seen 8x32 bins that have bigger FOV than 8x42 as well. Optics design is not as straightforward as you think.