Haven't you been paying attention? No way that works and you actually kill stuff. mtmuley
Leupold scopes love or hate em?
- Thread starter elkhuntinfool78
- Start date
mxracer317
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,204
Can someone school me on the new Leupold Mark 5 HD vs. VX-6HD for western big game hunting purposes?
huntin24/7
Well-known member
I’ve had a vx3 on my 7mm. Haven’t had to adjust my zero through 4 seasons. I have 3 other leupolds with no issues so far.
Brian in Montana
Well-known member
I don't guess I get around the interwebs all that much, but I'm sure I've never heard people trashing Leupold. I'd say most who've tried them like - love them. This is really a thing on other sites?
This thread sums up a lot of the talk around the web nicely. Most people who say Leupold works great are the ones who usually never dial, don't shoot past 400, and quite frankly, wouldn't know if their gun didn't return to zero or was off by a little while dialing. If you don't dial, Leupolds usually work great.
My entire life I used Leupold because that is what my dad had always used. I was happy and didn't noticed any problems because shooting longer range and dialing a scope wasn't a thing for me back then. A number of years ago I started shooting much more often and started messing around with shooting farther than I ever had. It wasn't long after that I started to notice all was not well with my Leupolds. The RTZ would be the most common issue I noticed after a session with lots of dialing. Since then I haven't purchased another Leupold and most likely never will until they start earning a reputation for durability with the "dialing" crowd.
With all that said, there is no other scope brand I would love to see return to their former glory than Leupold. I think their MK5 line would rule the market if they would take care of the rtz, and to a lesser degree, the tracking problems. Glass, eye relief, turret feel, weight, and price....the MK5 is arguably one of the best buys in that class of scopes. I wanted to buy one so bad for my latest rifle but I just couldn't risk it. The only thing holding the MK5 back is their durability and repeatability.
My entire life I used Leupold because that is what my dad had always used. I was happy and didn't noticed any problems because shooting longer range and dialing a scope wasn't a thing for me back then. A number of years ago I started shooting much more often and started messing around with shooting farther than I ever had. It wasn't long after that I started to notice all was not well with my Leupolds. The RTZ would be the most common issue I noticed after a session with lots of dialing. Since then I haven't purchased another Leupold and most likely never will until they start earning a reputation for durability with the "dialing" crowd.
With all that said, there is no other scope brand I would love to see return to their former glory than Leupold. I think their MK5 line would rule the market if they would take care of the rtz, and to a lesser degree, the tracking problems. Glass, eye relief, turret feel, weight, and price....the MK5 is arguably one of the best buys in that class of scopes. I wanted to buy one so bad for my latest rifle but I just couldn't risk it. The only thing holding the MK5 back is their durability and repeatability.
mxracer317
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,204
What do you now use?
Mostly NF, with a March in the mix. I'm putting together a rifle for my daughter which I'm thinking of trying out a Trijicon.
grizzly_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1,246
I have more Leupold scopes than anything else. They always work like they're supposed to. I put a Vortex HSLR on a gun and it was terrible. It helped me to miss the biggest buck I've ever shot at. I literally gave that to a guy I met on a hunting forum who lived in California. I even paid shipping to get rid of it.
I bought a Swaro Z5 and it is crystal clear, but has been in for warranty work. I don't think it's as sturdy as a Leupold.
Leupold is the best combination of optics, weight, and durability that I've used. I've never shot a NF though.
I bought a Swaro Z5 and it is crystal clear, but has been in for warranty work. I don't think it's as sturdy as a Leupold.
Leupold is the best combination of optics, weight, and durability that I've used. I've never shot a NF though.
Wind Gypsy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2017
- Messages
- 2,107
One is a front focal plane scope with reticles designed around holdovers/wind holds/measuring, with more elevation adjustment range, more tactile turrets, exposed windage turret more aligned with historically tactical or practical competition shooting applications. The other is a more weight conscious second focal plane scope designed like most other hunting scopes have been but with the sales pitch that people who don't understand ballistics can get a free custom turret for it that will do the understanding for them.
mxracer317
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,204
Fantastic. Thank you! Sounds like the preference is MK5?
Wind Gypsy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2017
- Messages
- 2,107
I’d prefer that but I prefer front focal plane scopes that adjust in mils so yeah but that doesn’t mean it’s better for someone else.
Knight.54
Well-known member
I own several. I would buy another if I needed one. I am proud to support an American company.
I’ve had a bad experience with Zeiss. I had a cheap bushnell on the first rifle I owned. I’ve got a redfield on my .22 mag Savage. My lever action Browning .22 wears a leupold. As does my Ruger .338…. No dials. No math at the moment of truth. Get closer.
My ownership and affinity go back to when Randy was only an accountant.
My binoculars are swaros. My rangefinder is a Leica.
I’ve had a bad experience with Zeiss. I had a cheap bushnell on the first rifle I owned. I’ve got a redfield on my .22 mag Savage. My lever action Browning .22 wears a leupold. As does my Ruger .338…. No dials. No math at the moment of truth. Get closer.
My ownership and affinity go back to when Randy was only an accountant.
My binoculars are swaros. My rangefinder is a Leica.
I've got 5 "hunting" rifles that I rotate through every hunting season (so they all get their exercise). Everyone of them has a Leupold scope...varying from VX3 to VX6 (3 of each I believe.) IMO they are the best scopes out there. I've owned Nightforce, Leica, Swarovski etc. and Leupold is my go to. Just my two cents.
mxracer317
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,204
Any opinions on a 44mm vs 50mm VX6HD? Throwing it on a 300 win mag. Previously, I had a 50mm, but a couple friends like the smaller 44mm.
The 2-12x42 VX6 is my favorite. Never messed around with the 44 or 50 mm. My friends have them, and they seem to be too heavy/bulky for me. Just my opinion.
mxracer317
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1,204
I wish there was a way to compare how much light transmission difference there is at dusk/dawn between those options.
Obviously more with the larger mm bells...it just depends on the country you hunt. Where I hunt it's not a major issue with me. I shot a bull this year with a 3-9x42 Leupold at 455 yards (my furthest shot to date) at first light and could see him fine. I would maybe contact leupold...I bet they have the statistics on that!
There is an 11 page thread on LRH about one guys experience with the vx-6, and that's just one thread.
You seem set on a Leupold but there are more reliable scopes in that price range. If you're set on a Leupold, I honestly hope you get a good one.
"Friends who dial scopes don't let friends buy Leupold scopes"
You seem set on a Leupold but there are more reliable scopes in that price range. If you're set on a Leupold, I honestly hope you get a good one.
"Friends who dial scopes don't let friends buy Leupold scopes"
Have you ever tried a Zeiss or a Trijcon or Meopta?
Recommendations for dialing? Working on my first set up and was planning to go NF NX8
