RobG
Well-known member
The sponsor told me he wouldn't support it with amendments either. I sure wish I knew why RMEF and MWF originally supported this. The increase in public access is proving to be minuscule with the existing version of this and I don't see how these changes would increase usage much. On the other hand, you can easily see how this program could change in the future towards RFW. It's quite conceivable that some of PL/PW folks want this as a starting point for something bigger.
Maybe they should kill the existing program too. We are only one unfriendly governor away from having that program expand into including landowner tags. It seems to be a seed ready to germinate into something we don't want.
Maybe they should kill the existing program too. We are only one unfriendly governor away from having that program expand into including landowner tags. It seems to be a seed ready to germinate into something we don't want.
Last edited: