So my 35 year old Smith and Wesson 1500 in .270 Win. is finally starting to loose its ability to shoot sub MOA. Loads that once shot .5" at 100 yards, are now shooting 1.75-2". It's been a great rifle, but I think it is time to either replace or rebore the barrel after more than a few thousand rounds. I am weighing the pros and cons of the two options and am thinking the rebore is the best option for economical reasons. The rifle was originally my one and only big game/varmit rifle, but will be my backup elk rifle. I was thinking of reboring the barrel to .338-06 AI or 35 Whelen. I have a .243 Win for varmit and deer. My .308 Win. is my main deer/elk rifle, so I thought a larger caliber option would be a good addition. So here is where I could use some input from those here in the know.
After researching past threads, I noticed a few of you have had JES rebore a barrel or two. How did they shoot after the rebore? Were you able to get sub MOA? After all is said and done, would it have been just as expensive to have the barrel replaced? .338-06 or 35 Whelen? I will be reloading all rounds, and fire forming cases is not a problem.
After researching past threads, I noticed a few of you have had JES rebore a barrel or two. How did they shoot after the rebore? Were you able to get sub MOA? After all is said and done, would it have been just as expensive to have the barrel replaced? .338-06 or 35 Whelen? I will be reloading all rounds, and fire forming cases is not a problem.