Kenetrek Boots

Iraq USA today article/report

Ithaca 37

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
5,427
Location
Home of the free, Land of the brave
A Marine sees what defeatists don't My view from Iraq is better than the media's (and closer to reality)
By Ben Connable


RAMADI, Iraq -- This is my third deployment with the 1st Marine Division to the Middle East.

This is the third time I've heard the quavering cries of the talking heads predicting failure and calling for withdrawal.

This is the third time I find myself shaking my head in disbelief.

Setbacks and tragedy are part and parcel of war and must be accepted on the battlefield. We can and will achieve our goals in Iraq.

Waiting for war in the Saudi Arabian desert as a young corporal in 1991, I recall reading news clippings portending massive tank battles, fiery death from Saddam Hussein's ''flame trenches'' and bitter defeat at the hands of the fourth-largest army in the world. My platoon was told to expect 75% casualties. Being Marines and, therefore, naturally cocky, we still felt pretty good about our abilities.

The panicky predictions failed to come true. The flame trenches sputtered. Nobody from my platoon died. Strength, ingenuity and willpower won the day. Crushing the fourth-largest army in the world in four days seemed to crush the doubts back home.

Twelve years passed, during which time America was faced with frustrating actions in Somalia and the Balkans. Doubt had begun to creep back into public debate.

In the spring of last year, I was a Marine captain, back with the division for Operation Iraqi Freedom. As I waited for war in the desert, just 100 miles to the north from our stepping-off point in 1991, I was again subjected to the panicky analyses of talking heads. There weren't enough troops to do the job, the oil fields would be destroyed, we couldn't fight in urban terrain, our offensive would grind to a halt, and we should expect more than 10,000 casualties.

Remembering my experience in Desert Storm, I took these assessments with a grain of salt. As a staff officer in the division command post, I was able to follow the larger battle as we moved forward. I knew that our tempo was keeping the enemy on his heels and that our plan would lead us to victory.

But war is never clean and simple. Mourning our losses quietly, the Marines drove to Baghdad, then to Tikrit, liberating the Iraqi people while losing fewer men than were lost in Desert Storm.

In May of last year, I was sitting with some fellow officers back in Diwaniyah, Iraq, the offensive successful and the country liberated from Saddam. I received a copy of a March 30 U.S. newspaper on Iraq in an old package that had finally made its way to the front. The stories: horror in Nasariyah, faltering supply lines and demonstrations in Cairo. The mood of the paper was impenetrably gloomy, and predictions of disaster abounded. The offensive was stalled; everyone was running out of supplies; we would be forced to withdraw.

The Arab world was about to ignite into a fireball of rage, and the Middle East was on the verge of collapse. If I had read those stories on March 30, I would have had a tough time either restraining my laughter or, conversely, falling into a funk. I was concerned about the bizarre kaleidoscope image of Iraq presented to the American people by writers viewing the world through a soda straw.

Returning to Iraq this past February, I knew that the Marines had a tremendous opportunity to follow through on our promises to the Iraqi people.

Believing in the mission, many Marines volunteered to return. I again found myself in the division headquarters.

Just weeks ago, I read that the supply lines were cut, ammunition and food were dwindling, the ''Sunni Triangle'' was exploding, cleric Muqtada al-Sadr was leading a widespread Shiite revolt, and the country was nearing civil war.

As I write this, the supply lines are open, there's plenty of ammunition and food, the Sunni Triangle is back to status quo, and Sadr is marginalized in Najaf. Once again, dire predictions of failure and disaster have been dismissed by American willpower and military professionalism.

War is inherently ugly and dramatic. I don't blame reporters for focusing on the burning vehicles, the mutilated bodies or the personal tragedies. The editors have little choice but to print the photos from the Abu Ghraib prison and the tales of the insurgency in Fallujah. These things sell news and remind us of the sober reality of our commitment to the Iraqi people. The actions of our armed forces are rightfully subject to scrutiny.

I am not ignorant of the political issues, either. But as a professional, I have the luxury of putting politics aside and focusing on the task at hand. Protecting people from terrorists and criminals while building schools and lasting friendships is a good mission, no matter what brush it's tarred with.

Nothing any talking head will say can deter me or my fellow Marines from caring about the people of Iraq, or take away from the sacrifices of our comrades. Fear in the face of adversity is human nature, and many people who take the counsel of their fears speak today. We are not deaf to their cries; neither do we take heed. All we ask is that Americans stand by us by supporting not just the troops, but also the mission.

We'll take care of the rest. Maj. Ben Connable is serving as a foreign-area officer and intelligence officer with the 1st Marine Division.

http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20040519/6213747s.htm
 
Thanks Ithaca. How did you find that? I went to the cover and quit after 15 minutes.

It sure would be nice if we could get some actual news instead of the filtered variety of alleged (yellow) journalism we keep reading / seeing.
 
Ithaca,
You may want to be careful posting articles that say our Iraq policies are succeeding. EG and Buzz, as well as John Kerry, need the U.S. to fail in Iraq in order to validate their rhetoric
According to these guys: We have been lied to, Iraq is a mess, Bush is driving up the price of gas personally, Mustard gas and Sarin gas are not proof a WMD program, the economy is not doing well, Prisoner abuse is the same as beheading civilians. By posting a positive article like this you may be voted off their buddy lists.

If the media portrayed the true work of our Soldiers, Sailors, Marines and Airmen then John Kerry wouldn't stand a chance. The left wing mainstream media would never allow that kind of truth to be shown.

Nemont
 
Hanger, I use Yahoo as my home page and when I clicked on a news link about Pvt. Jeremy Sivits being sentenced for the prisoner abuse the link to the above opinion appeared on the page with the Sivits article.

FWIW, I give Bush the benefit of the doubt. I don't think he fabricated a lie about the WMDs in Iraq, I think he just believed what he was told about WMDs. I believed it too. Now we find out the information everyone was relying on might not have been true. However, there was every reason to believe Saddam had the WMDs and I'd still bet that, someday, we'll find out that some WMDs were shipped out of country or hidden. I'm not going to bet much, though, maybe two dollars. :D
 
Ithaca,

I have a very good friend who is a Captain with the 1st marines in Iraq. From what I hear of him through his father they are doing very well. My wife is in the Guard fulltime and has several friends stationed over there as well and they are very positive about what they are doing. They have had a few bad nights but the vast majority of the citizens are very cordial and friendly to them. It saddens me to see the press and some on the left Kerry included go out and say what a failure this has been. It also saddens me that the majority of Americans do not have access to what is really happening.
 
That is what happens when a media has gotten out of control and want to run a government. Things alway's get distorted way out of proportion, which is pretty obvious to every one but those with their heads in the sand. Problem right now is that happens to be the masses in general. Or maybe that is what the media would like us all to belive...
We will find out what is belived in November I would guess....
Ithica is actually a pretty nice guy, he just wants to see this SI section and it's members posting a lot like is going on right now. It gets every one to thinking and a bunch off their butts to find out what the real truth is....
I have never met him, just watched his postings over the years and understands where he stands, probably more than he thinks ;) ...
 
I'll admit I'm happier than I've ever been about the topics and postings in SI. I really enjoy all the debate and different viewpoints. I especially like seeing anything that can be substantiated with a link to more info. Now, if we could just get back to the important stuff like fatassed ATV riders and welfare ranchers!!! ;)
 
Originally posted by Nemont:
Ithaca,
You may want to be careful posting articles that say our Iraq policies are succeeding. EG and Buzz, as well as John Kerry, need the U.S. to fail in Iraq in order to validate their rhetoric
Nemont,
Just the opposite, as I own a V-10, I have always been a strong supporter of taking down Iraq's dictator and opening up the production of the Oil Fields for more than the 2 million barrels of oil per day.

I am just terribly dissappointed that Oil is continuing to rise in price, due to Dubya's lack of planning for AFTER the fall of Saddam.
 
You don't seem to have a lot to do with your time, why don't you just run for President? Or is it just because it is so easy to sit back and be criticle with out haveing to produce any thing but what you find on the internet? You could just make all the difference in the world and save it at the same time, so you keep perporting!
And yes, before you jump on it, I find a lot of stuff off the internet to put on the Survival section. But there is also a lot I add to it that I have experienced.
 
I also try and add a lot of possitive to the rest of the board because there is a lot more to life than trying to put your dark cloud over the top of every one else, just to bring them down to your cloudy level.
 
Nemont,
Just the opposite, as I own a V-10, I have always been a strong supporter of taking down Iraq's dictator and opening up the production of the Oil Fields for more than the 2 million barrels of oil per day.
EG, did you develop amnesia up in Alaska, perhaps you spent too much time on the Great Alaskan Bush hunt and just aren't feeling yourself? I can go back through at least 10 posts where you blast Pres. Bush for invading Iraq. I couldn't find ONE where you supported taking down Saddam or wanting Iraqi oil to fuel you V10. I won't cut and paste all your anti Bush/Iraq rhetoric but you may need review your own posts so you can remember if you opposed the war before you supported it. Maybe only your family owns the V10.
Nemont
 
So let's see what the transit of conversation has shown us..

1. There is outrage that we are in Iraq and no WMD have been found.
2. Then there is outrage that we are in Iraq, no WMD have been found and we have no exit strategy.
3. Then there is outrage that we are in Iraq, no WMD have been found, have no exit strategy, and dissappointed that the price of oil is escalating.


What make you or anyone think that the President of the US has any control over what the OPEC ministers decide? What Pres has ever been able to control the price of oil?
 
Nemont,

I am sure that I have posted my concerns with Gas prices, and the failure of Dubya's efforts to get them lowered. That was the reason I supported the War in Iraq. (not to be confused with the War on Terror, which was in Afghnastan).

I don't support the idea that we "promoted Democracy in the Region", as I don't feel it is our place to choose governments for other countries.

The No-Fly Zone and embargoes were very cheap ways of keeping Saddam bottled up, and didn't require the costs (Soldiers or $$$).

If you want to go after WMD's, there were more immediate and relevant threats within the World... (See Also, N. Korea)
 
EG,
I stand correected I just couldn't find your posts saying that gas prices was an acceptable reason to go to war.
In fairness I only looked back 60 days.
I am curious how the president can control the price of gas? Isn't that what the market place is for?
The line of reasoning I love is that by jacking up gas prices Bush is just making his oil buddies rich. Wouldn't the oil companies want to see him reelected and help him by reducing gas prices? Note I am not saying you personally used this reasoning but that is the kind of things being said by your brothers on the left. Guys like Al Franken and Al Sharpton.

Nemont
 
Nemont,

I actually don't think the "War in Iraq" was for short term gas prices. It seems more plausible that it was for the Reserves buried under the sand.

I think Dubya can help his Cheney/Big Oil supporters better by pumping up their Reserves, as that is a very important measure of an Oil Company's value.

Question though, how come as gas prices go up, the spread between the different grades of gas gets wider???
 
Question though, how come as gas prices go up, the spread between the different grades of gas gets wider???
Same reason that when crude goes up it shows up at the pump in less than a week and when crude goes down you don't see a difference at the pump for several months. I don't know it is just the way it. That is a bad answer but it is all I have.


Nemont
 
Back
Top