EKYHunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2020
- Messages
- 1,189
Congrats!!! That’s a beautiful rifle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get the desire to have the lightest rifles,,,however.My pre 64 featherweight is heavier than my CA Mesa 300 WM.
Thanx. I’ll work on getting more fit.I get the desire to have the lightest rifles,,,however.
Most hunters, rather than worrying about a pound on a rifle would be better served by taking off 10, 20 or even more pounds off their bellys. Hunters by and large are way too large.
As the rifles got lighter the hunters have gotten heavier.
On my Swede I have a traditional leather whelen sling. Weighs a bit more than nylon but works so well it a hunter can get into a sitting position which requires rolling over a bit,,,which gets real hard if a belly gets in the way.
I am 74,, it gets harder as we get older, much harder.Thanx. I’ll work on getting more fit.
Loved those old Denver Redfield widefields. have a 2 3/4x wiefield on a 30-06 I got new about 1971 0r 72. Also have a Denver 1-4x I got about the same time. It's on a 308 I let a brother have. Got to thinking and my featherweight in 6.5x55 also has a Redfield but it's the Leupold/Redfield and it is a 2-7x. That old 2 3/4x on my 30-06 is my most favorite scope ever. Had it on a Rem 660 in 308 for a lot of years and have shot a lot of deer with it. Works today as well as ever. It origionally had the old 4 plex reticule in it.The Winchester model 70 featherweight was a "featherweight" for it's time. That time has past, unless I pick up my standard weight model 70 in 270. ( 7 3/4 pounds)
I have the Kimber Hunter in 280AI (5.75 pounds), I miss the bottom metal and trigger guard, kinda raygun-ish being all synthetic, and not only does it make my 6.6x55 model 70 Featherweight (6.75 pounds) seem heavy, but it even makes my Sako Finnlight (6 1/4 pounds) seem heavy also.
The trend continues and there is no turning back.
A few years ago I replaced my old heavy Kabar hunting knife with a Mora 2000 knife. Also bought hiking boots that were like dance slippers compared to my old Norwegian welt hard soled Italian hiking shoes.
Of course, if I had to traverse a steep sided mountain covered with frozen crust snow I could never "knife edge" or "toe stab" across with them as I could with my old heavy boots.
My Model 70 Swede is a joy to shoot. Recoil is in the 12 pound range. A Swede loaded to modern performance levels is the lowest power I accept with full confidence as an "all around" caliber. It pleases me no end that it was an Olympic gold model winner in times gone by, was used by Scandanavian explorers of the Arctic for polar bear defense.
That the Finnish hunters who turned soldier/snipers used it to spread terror into Russian invaders into their homeland, is so much the greater merit.
As far as the Model 70 goes; on the barrel is says "Made in New Haven Ct. USA" and that means a lot to me,,,makes it feel lighter. The scope I now have on it is a mint condition vintage Redfield 2-7 variable, with the widefield front lens. It was made in Denver, Colorado. It is just such a cool rig and I love sliding that slim shnabel forend into a saddle scabbard.
Last thought,,,when I get a bit superstitious and want to ask the universe for some good luck, I can still "knock on its wooden stock"
I like that a lot too. Wood was once alive. Throw in Lapua Brass and modern Barnes bullets and the whole rig ready for the modern world and more than earned that one extra pound over the Kimber
Good luck selling this crowd on the advantages of the sling and sitting position versus prone w object as rest. I've tried for years. Gimme that old time religion:I get the desire to have the lightest rifles,,,however.
Most hunters, rather than worrying about a pound on a rifle would be better served by taking off 10, 20 or even more pounds off their bellys. Hunters by and large are way too large.
As the rifles got lighter the hunters have gotten heavier.
On my Swede I have a traditional leather whelen sling. Weighs a bit more than nylon but works so well it a hunter can get into a sitting position which requires rolling over a bit,,,which gets real hard if a belly gets in the way.
You can forgo the sling and set your high tech backpack upright, between your legs for a rest. Mo beta than a sling, but it doesn’t work if you have a flat brim.With cap on backward, it can even be adapted for metric chamberings.
I don't think there can be any doubt that prone with a rest is the most accurate most of us can shoot but I'll take a military type sling and proper shooting position any day over some kind of solid rest in the field. One thing wrong with the prone position is even though it's most stable it also lowest to the ground and at that, to many times ground clutter interfear's with you. My own prefered position has always been sitting where I folded my right foot under my butt and sit on it. Something else people either seem to forget or simply don't know is that quite often to correect for a rifle shooting off more way or the other, it's not the sights you need to move but, your body or in prone your feet! Your body not positioned well will put stress into the hold and throw the shot off. More the feet or body to correct, get the stress out of the platform and the point of aim suddemly start's to work again like magic. The sling actuall pulls the butt of the rifle back into you if it's used right. Pull the rifle into a steady, not stressed, platform and the rifle starts shooting better. next time your out shooting, before you take the shot, close your eyes for a moment and totally relax. Then open your eyes and it your not looking at the same point of aim, you need to reduse the stress in your body!Good luck selling this crowd on the advantages of the sling and sitting position versus prone w object as rest. I've tried for years. Gimme that old time religion:
View attachment 229798
With cap on backward, it can even be adapted for metric chamberings.
When necessity and opportunity coincide, mom invention takes over...You can forgo the sling and set your high tech backpack upright, between your legs for a rest. Mo beta than a sling, but it doesn’t work if you have a flat brim.
Couple of my rifles, the black one and the FDE are finicky about price point and logo on backpacks used for hunting rests. Anyone else?You can forgo the sling and set your high tech backpack upright, between your legs for a rest. Mo beta than a sling, but it doesn’t work if you have a flat brim.
Mine likes a Dora the Explorer backpack.Couple of my rifles, the black one and the FDE are finicky about price point and logo on backpacks used for hunting rests. Anyone else?
We’re gonna need packout photos from the gram and I also suspect you may have shot the elk for laughing at you…Mine likes a Dora the Explorer backpack.
What you are not factoring in with a properly fitted and used Whelen sling, is the isometric tension created by the 2/3 rearwards firm pull into your shoulder and the 1/3 push forwards to the sling swivel. This tension not only significantly reduces felt recoil by the controlled push forwards but also steadies the rifle more by having it engaged in a semi locked in control that creates stability.You can forgo the sling and set your high tech backpack upright, between your legs for a rest. Mo beta than a sling, but it doesn’t work if you have a flat brim.
I didn’t say you should. I said you can.He would just smile at your comments about how one should just "forgo" the sling.
I apologize if I was sounding abrasive.I didn’t say you should. I said you can.
Good luck getting a deer out of the country I hunt with a canvas shoulder bag.
I’ve killed more than one mountain whitetail with a cumbersome backpack on.