338win
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2015
- Messages
- 438
Rich a$$holes being rich a$$holes. Who would have imagined.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like how you think!Theres' a fishing access 600 yards down river. Not miles down river, 600 yards. With that said, go the corner crossing route and build a ladder from the pullout to the highwater mark.
Love the ladder idea.... Is this the access just upstream of the Norris road bridge?Theres' a fishing access 600 yards down river. Not miles down river, 600 yards. With that said, go the corner crossing route and build a ladder from the pullout to the highwater mark.
yeah. where the homeless orgies used to be. don't ask me how i know.Love the ladder idea.... Is this the access just upstream of the Norris road bridge?
yeah. where the homeless orgies used to be. don't ask me how i know.
You notice how the article does not seem to mention this...lolTheres' a fishing access 600 yards down river. Not miles down river, 600 yards. With that said, go the corner crossing route and build a ladder from the pullout to the highwater mark.
It also sounds like we're about 2 years away from a prescriptive easement if the open, hostile use continues, at least by my understanding of that law.
I stand corrected. Thanks for clearing that up!Prescriptive Easement Not Acquired By Recreational Use Of Surface Waters
23-2-322. Prescriptive easement not acquired by recreational use of surface waters. (1) A prescriptive easement is a right to use the property of another that is acquired by open, exclusive, notorious, hostile, adverse, continuous, and uninterrupted use for a period of 5 years.
(2) A prescriptive easement cannot be acquired through:
(a) recreational use of surface waters, including:
(i) the streambeds underlying them;
(ii) the banks up to the ordinary high-water mark; or
(iii) any portage over and around barriers; or
(b) the entering or crossing of private property to reach surface waters.
You don't have utility easements in Texas?...then there's that day when you walk outside and discover the cable company trenching your back yard.
...then there's that day when you walk outside and discover the cable company trenching your back yard.
Yes, and an army of special interest lobbyists swarming Austin.You don't have utility easements in Texas?
When I worked in the biz if we weren’t given permission to brig trucks in or couldn’t get one in due to size we would use 32’ ladders insteadYes, and and an army of special interest lobbyists swarming Austin.
We don't have an alley but they actually didn't tear up too much lawn. Some of our rear fence neighbors told em hell no, nimby, and it worked.
I, on the other hand, am a pretty damn nice gentleman.
There is, or was..... "Shed's Bridge" and it has been closed off with SITE CLOSED signs for many years. They say due to 'bank erosion' - so you can't access there either. And there are no other access points between Axtell and Cameron Bridge - a stretch of roughly 12+ river miles.Theres' a fishing access 600 yards down river. Not miles down river, 600 yards. With that said, go the corner crossing route and build a ladder from the pullout to the highwater mark.
Yea I get that. But if people naturally walk on a path enough, it modifies the bank anyway. A shovel would just make it safer, faster. Its not like bringing in heavy equipment, just enough of a path to walk down between some brush.actually that could violate Montana law too...modifying the bank would violate Montana 310 laws. I know it happens everyday and goes largely ignored but this being a publicly contentious location it definitely wouldn't go unenforced.
Isn’t the east side of sheds still open? I should’ve verified that before opening my dumb mouth. I knew the west side was shut down but TBH, I have no reason to access the river there.There is, or was..... "Shed's Bridge" and it has been closed off with SITE CLOSED signs for many years. They say due to 'bank erosion' - so you can't access there either. And there are no other access points between Axtell and Cameron Bridge - a stretch of roughly 12+ river miles.
Just one more papercut on the road to eliminating public access, or making it so difficult/complicated people give up trying.
I cannot even believe what I have read. I’m glad it says they’ve changed hands on the contested piece of land because I’m ready to TP their house and leave burning paper shit bagsFriend of mine sent me this article this morning. Essentially, the public has been using a specific access point for over 100 years, then rich out of staters buy the place and try to block the access. The traditional access is, in fact, barely on private land, and no good river access remains due to the bank slope.
Not sure if there’s a fight here that’s worth fighting, but it’s worth spreading the word about.
In a Tale as Old as the West, Wealthy Californians Moved to Montana and Blocked Historic River Access
In 2021, lifelong Montanan and duck hunter Matt Treinen was ticketed for criminal trespass at a river access he'd used since he was a kid.www.outdoorlife.com