Easy peasy elk killing. mtmuleyGetting a rifle that can kill elk out to 400y is not that hard if you can do your job behind the trigger.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Easy peasy elk killing. mtmuleyGetting a rifle that can kill elk out to 400y is not that hard if you can do your job behind the trigger.
Tags - hardEasy peasy elk killing. mtmuley
Sorry. Thought you said 400 yards. mtmuleyTags - hard
Finding them - hard
Packing out - hard
Shooting elk in lungs with 260Rem to 300RUM at 300y - not hard
I agree, if you are happy with your 24" sporter 30-06 barrel then absolutely zero reason to switch to .308 24" sporter barrel.Rebarreling a 06 to a .308 is absolutely pointless and a huge waste of money.
Damn, I love TR quotes.(Long quote from T.R. on the choice of a rifle removed. @VikingsGuy said not to make him regret starting the thread.....)
Proof that beauty/fit is in the eye of the beholder - as in my case I like my several B&C's on tikkas and the only aftermarket stock I have thrown out was a Hogue Overmold.The most expensive thing in my wasted money barrel is a B&C stock I bought for a Mauser build.
. . . I sometimes swap the factory stock out for a Hogue Overmold.
In my opinion the 280AI felt recoil was quite a bit less. I was shooting without a break in a sub 7 pound rifle and it wasn't unbearable. I did put a break on as recommended by the gun smith who built my rifle which makes it much more pleasant to shoot but it was way better then my 8.5-9 pound .30-06 even shooting the heaving 170 grain partitions.I'm not 100% sure you can have everything you want with a .280 AI. The parts that seem to conflict are the desire to shoot heavy bullets, coupled with the desire for less recoil. I've never owned one, but I can't imagine that shooting 175 grain bullets in a .280 AI is going to get you much less recoil than your 'o6 with 168's. I might (respectfully) suggest that you worry less about big bullets. The fact that you've recognized recoil as something you'd like to reduce means it's probably affecting your shooting. Get something that legitimately kicks less, like a 7mm-08, or a 7x57. Maybe even something like a 6.5 PRC if your heart goes pitter patter over flatter trajectories. They'll all kill elk. Just my two cents.
I'm only sad because I love my 280AI haha!I would not get an AI anything. Easier to get a rifle in a standard cartridge that will handle what you want.
Given the two rifles in question, that could also have alot to do with the stock and the recoil pad. You're driving a Porche against a Corolla.In my opinion the 280AI felt recoil was quite a bit less. I was shooting without a break in a sub 7 pound rifle and it wasn't unbearable. I did put a break on as recommended by the gun smith who built my rifle which makes it much more pleasant to shoot but it was way better then my 8.5-9 pound .30-06 even shooting the heaving 170 grain partitions.
edited to my perceived recoil: comparing a semi custom Kimber Montana 280AI (7lbs) to a Ruger American .30-06 with a heavier scope, rings, aftermarket pad that I never weighed.
That is a fair assessment and I’ve never driven a Porsche or shot a higher end .30-06.Given the two rifles in question, that could also have alot to do with the stock and the recoil pad. You're driving a Porche against a Corolla.